Calcaneal locking intramedullary nailing versus extensile lateral plating for displaced intra‑articular calcaneal fractures: a propensity‑weighted cohort study focusing on perioperative soft‑tissue burden and early recovery trajectories

BACKGROUND: Displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs) are among the most challenging hindfoot injuries and are often associated with persistent disability, reduced quality of life, and treatment-related complications [1, 2]. Although extensile lateral open reduction and plate fixation can restore calcaneal anatomy, it is accompanied by substantial soft-tissue morbidity [3-6]. Locking intramedullary nailing (IMN) is less invasive, yet comparative studies often emphasize overall complication rates and long-term functional scores, with limited quantification of perioperative soft-tissue management burden and early recovery trajectories [9, 10]. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study comparing locking IMN with extensile lateral plating (ORIF) in adults with DIACFs. The primary outcomes were (1) a Soft‑Tissue Burden Index (STBI) incorporating drain utilization, postoperative drainage volume, wound leakage duration, dressing changes, aspiration for hematoma/seroma, and soft‑tissue reintervention; and (2) early recovery trajectories using repeated pain scores (VAS) and patient‑reported outcomes (Foot Function Index, FFI) at prespecified time points (2, 6, and 12 weeks; 6 and 12 months). Confounding was addressed using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) [13-15, 17]. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included (IMN n = 28; ORIF n = 62). After IPTW, baseline covariates were balanced. IMN demonstrated a lower STBI than ORIF (weighted mean 1.3 ± 1.1 vs. 3.5 ± 1.4; p < 0.001), driven by reduced drain utilization (3/28 [11%] vs. 59/62 [95%]; p < 0.001) and fewer dressing changes within 14 days (2.2 ± 1.5 vs. 6.4 ± 3.1; p < 0.001). Early recovery favored IMN, with lower VAS at 6 weeks (2.5 ± 1.2 vs. 3.7 ± 1.4; p < 0.001) and 12 weeks (1.7 ± 1.0 vs. 2.4 ± 1.2; p = 0.020), and better FFI at 6 weeks (52.3 ± 14.7 vs. 63.1 ± 15.4; p < 0.001) and 12 weeks (34.4 ± 12.3 vs. 43.2 ± 13.1; p = 0.003). Time to full weight bearing was shorter in IMN (10.7 ± 2.3 vs. 12.9 ± 2.6 weeks; p = 0.004). Twelve‑month functional outcomes were similar (FFI 16.8 ± 8.6 vs. 18.2 ± 9.4; p = 0.520). Wound‑related complications were lower in IMN (1/28 [4%] vs. 12/62 [19%]; p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Locking IMN showed lower perioperative soft‑tissue burden and faster early recovery compared with extensile lateral plating, while maintaining similar mid‑term outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-07073-y
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Calcaneal locking intramedullary nailing versus extensile lateral plating for displaced intra‑articular calcaneal fractures: a propensity‑weighted cohort study focusing on perioperative soft‑tissue burden and early recovery trajectories

Liang Liu, Dong Wang, Qidong Guo
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

Calcaneal locking intramedullary nailing versus extensile lateral plating for displaced intra‑articular calcaneal fractures: a propensity‑weighted cohort study focusing on perioperative soft‑tissue burden and early recovery trajectories

Liang Liu, Dong Wang, Qidong Guo
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs) are among the most challenging hindfoot injuries and are often associated with persistent disability, reduced quality of life, and treatment-related complications [1, 2]. Although extensile lateral open reduction and plate fixation can restore calcaneal anatomy, it is accompanied by substantial soft-tissue morbidity [3-6]. Locking intramedullary nailing (IMN) is less invasive, yet comparative studies often emphasize overall complication rates and long-term functional scores, with limited quantification of perioperative soft-tissue management burden and early recovery trajectories [9, 10]. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study comparing locking IMN with extensile lateral plating (ORIF) in adults with DIACFs. The primary outcomes were (1) a Soft‑Tissue Burden Index (STBI) incorporating drain utilization, postoperative drainage volume, wound leakage duration, dressing changes, aspiration for hematoma/seroma, and soft‑tissue reintervention; and (2) early recovery trajectories using repeated pain scores (VAS) and patient‑reported outcomes (Foot Function Index, FFI) at prespecified time points (2, 6, and 12 weeks; 6 and 12 months). Confounding was addressed using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) [13-15, 17]. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included (IMN n = 28; ORIF n = 62). After IPTW, baseline covariates were balanced. IMN demonstrated a lower STBI than ORIF (weighted mean 1.3 ± 1.1 vs. 3.5 ± 1.4; p < 0.001), driven by reduced drain utilization (3/28 [11%] vs. 59/62 [95%]; p < 0.001) and fewer dressing changes within 14 days (2.2 ± 1.5 vs. 6.4 ± 3.1; p < 0.001). Early recovery favored IMN, with lower VAS at 6 weeks (2.5 ± 1.2 vs. 3.7 ± 1.4; p < 0.001) and 12 weeks (1.7 ± 1.0 vs. 2.4 ± 1.2; p = 0.020), and better FFI at 6 weeks (52.3 ± 14.7 vs. 63.1 ± 15.4; p < 0.001) and 12 weeks (34.4 ± 12.3 vs. 43.2 ± 13.1; p = 0.003). Time to full weight bearing was shorter in IMN (10.7 ± 2.3 vs. 12.9 ± 2.6 weeks; p = 0.004). Twelve‑month functional outcomes were similar (FFI 16.8 ± 8.6 vs. 18.2 ± 9.4; p = 0.520). Wound‑related complications were lower in IMN (1/28 [4%] vs. 12/62 [19%]; p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Locking IMN showed lower perioperative soft‑tissue burden and faster early recovery compared with extensile lateral plating, while maintaining similar mid‑term outcomes.

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Shanxi Medical University (CN), Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.