Books, schools, and restaurants

Abstract This is a contribution to a symposium on David Liebesman and Ofra Magidor’s book Property Versatility and Copredication . It was originally presented, in compressed version, at the 2026 Eastern APA. I agree with their big picture metaphysical view, but quibble at four points about its application to social metaphysics. First, Liebesman and Magidor argue that abstract objects can have paradigmatically physical properties like being on shelves. I agree, and suggest they should accept the converse claim, that physical objects can have properties usually associated with abstracta. Second, I argue that there are several puzzles about how their view applied to books of variable granularity, like multi-volume works, or volumes containing several books. Third, I argue (against their preferred view of schools) that schools can come in different levels of granularity. Finally, I argue that ‘restaurant’ and ‘coffee shop’ can sometimes pick out physical objects. Liebesman and Magidor argue that these terms don’t pick out buildings, and I agree. But, I claim, they do sometimes pick out physical locations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Philosophy
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44204-026-00423-x
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Books, schools, and restaurants

Brian Weatherson
Asian Journal of Philosophy
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
article

Books, schools, and restaurants

Brian Weatherson
article en

Abstract

Abstract This is a contribution to a symposium on David Liebesman and Ofra Magidor’s book Property Versatility and Copredication . It was originally presented, in compressed version, at the 2026 Eastern APA. I agree with their big picture metaphysical view, but quibble at four points about its application to social metaphysics. First, Liebesman and Magidor argue that abstract objects can have paradigmatically physical properties like being on shelves. I agree, and suggest they should accept the converse claim, that physical objects can have properties usually associated with abstracta. Second, I argue that there are several puzzles about how their view applied to books of variable granularity, like multi-volume works, or volumes containing several books. Third, I argue (against their preferred view of schools) that schools can come in different levels of granularity. Finally, I argue that ‘restaurant’ and ‘coffee shop’ can sometimes pick out physical objects. Liebesman and Magidor argue that these terms don’t pick out buildings, and I agree. But, I claim, they do sometimes pick out physical locations.

Asian Journal of PhilosophyVol. 5(2)
University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.