Evaluation of Downscaled <scp>CMIP6</scp> Performance for Rainfall and Wind Over the Maritime Continent

ABSTRACT High‐resolution climate change projections over the Maritime Continent (MC) are increasingly critical to develop climate policies and adaptation planning at the regional level. However, modelling rainfall and wind over the MC still leads to substantial errors in capturing climate processes over the most complex land–atmosphere–ocean interaction. This study evaluated the performance of the 14 downscaled CMIP6 models from the NASA Earth Exchange Global Daily Downscaled Projections (NEX‐GDDP) at 0.25° resolution in simulating spatial and temporal variability of rainfall and wind over the MC. The simulated rainfall and wind speed over the period 1995–2014 are evaluated against meteorological station data and gridded datasets, including the Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Rainfall with Station data (CHIRPS) for rainfall and the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis 5 (ERA5) for wind speed. Results demonstrated that the models are capable of representing the regional characteristics of the annual and seasonal variation of rainfall and wind. Nevertheless, systematic biases remain consistently overestimated for rainfall when compared with observations (35%–94%) and slightly underestimated compared with CHIRPS (−4% to −5.6%). The model overestimated wind for both mean and extreme wind (i.e., 34%–120% for observations and 11%–48% for ERA5), except western MC showed a slight underestimation relative to ERA5 (−6.9%). The largest bias of extreme rainfall intensity is mainly depicted over region C (Maluku) compared to regions A (Sumatra) and B (Java). This result suggests that the models are capable of simulating monsoonal and equatorial rainfall patterns compared to anti‐monsoonal rainfall, which may be dominated by anvil rain type. Our study also highlighted that model rankings vary according to the variable, reference dataset and metric used, and that no single model consistently outperforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Climatology
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.70476
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Downscaled CMIP6 Performance for Rainfall and Wind Over the Maritime Continent

Abdul Basit, Erma Yulihastin, Fiolenta Marpaung, Inovasita Alifdini et al.
International Journal of Climatology
Climate variability and models
article

Evaluation of Downscaled CMIP6 Performance for Rainfall and Wind Over the Maritime Continent

Abdul Basit, Erma Yulihastin, Fiolenta Marpaung, Inovasita Alifdini, M. Furqon Azis Ismail
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT High‐resolution climate change projections over the Maritime Continent (MC) are increasingly critical to develop climate policies and adaptation planning at the regional level. However, modelling rainfall and wind over the MC still leads to substantial errors in capturing climate processes over the most complex land–atmosphere–ocean interaction. This study evaluated the performance of the 14 downscaled CMIP6 models from the NASA Earth Exchange Global Daily Downscaled Projections (NEX‐GDDP) at 0.25° resolution in simulating spatial and temporal variability of rainfall and wind over the MC. The simulated rainfall and wind speed over the period 1995–2014 are evaluated against meteorological station data and gridded datasets, including the Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Rainfall with Station data (CHIRPS) for rainfall and the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis 5 (ERA5) for wind speed. Results demonstrated that the models are capable of representing the regional characteristics of the annual and seasonal variation of rainfall and wind. Nevertheless, systematic biases remain consistently overestimated for rainfall when compared with observations (35%–94%) and slightly underestimated compared with CHIRPS (−4% to −5.6%). The model overestimated wind for both mean and extreme wind (i.e., 34%–120% for observations and 11%–48% for ERA5), except western MC showed a slight underestimation relative to ERA5 (−6.9%). The largest bias of extreme rainfall intensity is mainly depicted over region C (Maluku) compared to regions A (Sumatra) and B (Java). This result suggests that the models are capable of simulating monsoonal and equatorial rainfall patterns compared to anti‐monsoonal rainfall, which may be dominated by anvil rain type. Our study also highlighted that model rankings vary according to the variable, reference dataset and metric used, and that no single model consistently outperforms.

International Journal of Climatology
Meteorological, Climatological, And Geophysical Agency (ID)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.