Pomological and biochemical characterization of Musa acuminata ‘Dwarf Cavendish’ and Musa acuminata ‘Red Dacca’ banana cultivars

In this study, the pomological, physicochemical, and biochemical properties of Dwarf Cavendish and Red Dacca banana cultivars were comparatively evaluated. In addition to pomological traits such as fruit weight, fruit diameter, and length, parameters including total soluble solids (TSS), pH, titratable acidity (TA), color parameters (L*, a*, b*), total phenolic and flavonoid contents, and antioxidant activity were determined. According to the results, the fruit weight (171.32 g) and diameter (38.98 mm) of Dwarf Cavendish bananas were statistically higher than those of the Red Dacca cultivar (71.78 g and 33.55 mm, respectively) (p < 0.05). In contrast, Red Dacca showed higher TSS (17.86%) and pH (6.06) values, while its titratable acidity (0.07%) was lower. Color analysis revealed that Dwarf Cavendish had higher L* (72.60) and b* (46.22) values, whereas Red Dacca was characterized by a higher a* value (7.79). Biochemical analyses indicated that Red Dacca was richer in total phenolic (363.84 mg GAE/100 g) and flavonoid (9.40 mg CAE/100 g) contents. Although antioxidant activity values were high in both cultivars (86–87%), statistically significant differences were observed depending on cultivar and sample type (peel/pulp) (p <0.05). In conclusion, Dwarf Cavendish bananas were superior in terms of pomological characteristics, whereas Red Dacca exhibited higher quality in terms of biochemical and functional properties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2026.2.17
Primary Topic
Banana Cultivation and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pomological and biochemical characterization of Musa acuminata ‘Dwarf Cavendish’ and Musa acuminata ‘Red Dacca’ banana cultivars

Ayşe Vildan Pepe, Civan Çelik, Ayten Sıla Avci
International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences
Banana Cultivation and Research
article

Pomological and biochemical characterization of Musa acuminata ‘Dwarf Cavendish’ and Musa acuminata ‘Red Dacca’ banana cultivars

Ayşe Vildan Pepe, Civan Çelik, Ayten Sıla Avci
article en

Abstract

In this study, the pomological, physicochemical, and biochemical properties of Dwarf Cavendish and Red Dacca banana cultivars were comparatively evaluated. In addition to pomological traits such as fruit weight, fruit diameter, and length, parameters including total soluble solids (TSS), pH, titratable acidity (TA), color parameters (L*, a*, b*), total phenolic and flavonoid contents, and antioxidant activity were determined. According to the results, the fruit weight (171.32 g) and diameter (38.98 mm) of Dwarf Cavendish bananas were statistically higher than those of the Red Dacca cultivar (71.78 g and 33.55 mm, respectively) (p < 0.05). In contrast, Red Dacca showed higher TSS (17.86%) and pH (6.06) values, while its titratable acidity (0.07%) was lower. Color analysis revealed that Dwarf Cavendish had higher L* (72.60) and b* (46.22) values, whereas Red Dacca was characterized by a higher a* value (7.79). Biochemical analyses indicated that Red Dacca was richer in total phenolic (363.84 mg GAE/100 g) and flavonoid (9.40 mg CAE/100 g) contents. Although antioxidant activity values were high in both cultivars (86–87%), statistically significant differences were observed depending on cultivar and sample type (peel/pulp) (p <0.05). In conclusion, Dwarf Cavendish bananas were superior in terms of pomological characteristics, whereas Red Dacca exhibited higher quality in terms of biochemical and functional properties.

International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences(Advanced Online Publication)
Isparta University of Applied Sciences (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Banana Cultivation and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.