Guidance and counseling service utilization as a predictor of test anxiety among Injibara University students: a cross-sectional study

This study examined the relationship between guidance and counseling service (GCS) utilization and test anxiety among students at Injibara University, considering the mediation effects of demographic factors, including gender, age, year of study, residential background, and college affiliation. A cross-sectional survey design was employed, with data collected from 303 students using a structured, self-administered questionnaire. A stratified random sampling technique was applied to ensure representative participation. Items assessing GCS utilization were adapted from the Student Academic Advising and Counseling Survey (SAACS; Cronbach’s α = .87; 2023), and test anxiety was measured using an adapted Westside Test Anxiety Scale (Cronbach’s α = .91; [ 15 , 51 ]), both employing 5-point Likert-type response formats. Descriptive statistics, including means, standard deviations, and percentages, were used to determine levels of counseling service utilization and test anxiety. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a significant negative relationship between guidance and counseling services utilization and test anxiety, and Simple linear regression indicated that greater utilization of guidance and counseling services was associated with lower test anxiety, explaining approximately 21% of the variance. General Linear Model (GLM) analysis showed that gender and residential background significantly influenced test anxiety, whereas age, year of study, and college affiliation did not. Findings indicate that most students experience moderate levels of test anxiety and underutilize guidance and counseling services. These results underscore the protective role of guidance and counseling services in managing test anxiety and highlight the need for targeted awareness campaigns, improved accessibility, and institutionally supported counseling interventions to enhance students’ academic performance and psychological well-being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Public Health
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-026-02435-7
Primary Topic
Health and Well-being Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guidance and counseling service utilization as a predictor of test anxiety among Injibara University students: a cross-sectional study

Abebaw Yeneneh
Discover Public Health
Health and Well-being Studies
article

Guidance and counseling service utilization as a predictor of test anxiety among Injibara University students: a cross-sectional study

Abebaw Yeneneh
article en

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between guidance and counseling service (GCS) utilization and test anxiety among students at Injibara University, considering the mediation effects of demographic factors, including gender, age, year of study, residential background, and college affiliation. A cross-sectional survey design was employed, with data collected from 303 students using a structured, self-administered questionnaire. A stratified random sampling technique was applied to ensure representative participation. Items assessing GCS utilization were adapted from the Student Academic Advising and Counseling Survey (SAACS; Cronbach’s α = .87; 2023), and test anxiety was measured using an adapted Westside Test Anxiety Scale (Cronbach’s α = .91; [ 15 , 51 ]), both employing 5-point Likert-type response formats. Descriptive statistics, including means, standard deviations, and percentages, were used to determine levels of counseling service utilization and test anxiety. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a significant negative relationship between guidance and counseling services utilization and test anxiety, and Simple linear regression indicated that greater utilization of guidance and counseling services was associated with lower test anxiety, explaining approximately 21% of the variance. General Linear Model (GLM) analysis showed that gender and residential background significantly influenced test anxiety, whereas age, year of study, and college affiliation did not. Findings indicate that most students experience moderate levels of test anxiety and underutilize guidance and counseling services. These results underscore the protective role of guidance and counseling services in managing test anxiety and highlight the need for targeted awareness campaigns, improved accessibility, and institutionally supported counseling interventions to enhance students’ academic performance and psychological well-being.

Discover Public HealthVol. 23(1)
Jigjiga University (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health and Well-being Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.