Dynamic complementarity between noncognitive and cognitive skills: evidence from adolescent development in India

Using longitudinal Young Lives data from Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, India, we examine the effect of noncognitive skills on cognitive abilities at the onset of adolescence and later adolescence, and address endogeneity by using siblings’ noncognitive traits and primary caregiver well-being as imperfectly excluded instruments for the focal child’s noncognitive abilities. Our results suggest that agency improves mathematical ability at the onset of adolescence, indicating a sensitive period of development. No similar effect on language abilities at the same stage indicates domain-specificity of agency effects. Self-efficacy has no effect on cognitive outcomes at either stage. We are unable to reject the null that agency and self-efficacy have no effect on cognitive abilities in later adolescence. Agency effects are concentrated among boys, consistent with theories of gender-specific socialization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Economics
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2026.2695410
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic complementarity between noncognitive and cognitive skills: evidence from adolescent development in India

Ajay Sharma, Vanshika Chaudhary
Applied Economics
Cultural Differences and Values
article

Dynamic complementarity between noncognitive and cognitive skills: evidence from adolescent development in India

Ajay Sharma, Vanshika Chaudhary
article en

Abstract

Using longitudinal Young Lives data from Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, India, we examine the effect of noncognitive skills on cognitive abilities at the onset of adolescence and later adolescence, and address endogeneity by using siblings’ noncognitive traits and primary caregiver well-being as imperfectly excluded instruments for the focal child’s noncognitive abilities. Our results suggest that agency improves mathematical ability at the onset of adolescence, indicating a sensitive period of development. No similar effect on language abilities at the same stage indicates domain-specificity of agency effects. Self-efficacy has no effect on cognitive outcomes at either stage. We are unable to reject the null that agency and self-efficacy have no effect on cognitive abilities in later adolescence. Agency effects are concentrated among boys, consistent with theories of gender-specific socialization.

Applied Economics
International Labour Organization (CH), Indian Institute of Management Indore (IN), O. P. Jindal Global University (IN), Global University (LB)
University of Oxford, Department for International Development
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cultural Differences and Values
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.