Refusal of Hospital-Based Oral Cancer Treatment Driven by Health Beliefs in Pakistan: A Qualitative Study

OBJECTIVES: Hospital-based treatment refusal among oral cancer (OC) patients remains poorly understood. No qualitative studies have examined this phenomenon specifically in OC. This study aimed to explore the beliefs and attitudes underlying treatment refusal among OC patients in Pakistan. METHODS: We conducted a theory-informed qualitative case study guided by the Health Belief Model (HBM) using purposive criterion sampling. Semistructured interviews were conducted with eight OC patients who refused hospital-based treatment, eight family members involved in decision-making, and three oral surgeons. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, translated into English, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Emergent themes were subsequently interpreted in relation to HBM constructs using abductive, theory-informed pattern matching. Methodological rigour was enhanced through data source triangulation and member checking. RESULTS: From the 19 in-depth interviews, we identified seven interconnected themes underlying treatment refusal: perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, self-efficacy, cues to action, and religious beliefs. Treatment refusal was shaped by fatalistic perceptions of cancer incurability, intense fears of treatment-related harm, and substantial financial, access, and role-related constraints. Strong family influence and trust in traditional and complementary medicine further reinforced these decisions. Religious interpretations functioned bidirectionally, reinforcing acceptance of divine destiny and legitimizing nonbiomedical healing pathways, while in some cases also supporting treatment-seeking through religious doctrine. CONCLUSION: Refusal of hospital-based OC treatment reflects a culturally embedded decision-making process shaped by interacting sociocultural, religious, and structural factors. The findings support the applicability of the HBM in this context and inform the development of culturally responsive, communication-focused interventions in oral oncology. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Recognition of belief-driven treatment refusal can help clinicians tailor communication, address fears of treatment harm, and engage family and religious influences to improve acceptance of hospital-based OC care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Dental Journal
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2026.109701
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Refusal of Hospital-Based Oral Cancer Treatment Driven by Health Beliefs in Pakistan: A Qualitative Study

Supawadee Naorungroj, Hutcha Sriplung, Wit Wichaidit, Duangporn Kerdpon et al.
International Dental Journal
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Refusal of Hospital-Based Oral Cancer Treatment Driven by Health Beliefs in Pakistan: A Qualitative Study

Supawadee Naorungroj, Hutcha Sriplung, Wit Wichaidit, Duangporn Kerdpon, Muhammad Usman Amanat
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Hospital-based treatment refusal among oral cancer (OC) patients remains poorly understood. No qualitative studies have examined this phenomenon specifically in OC. This study aimed to explore the beliefs and attitudes underlying treatment refusal among OC patients in Pakistan. METHODS: We conducted a theory-informed qualitative case study guided by the Health Belief Model (HBM) using purposive criterion sampling. Semistructured interviews were conducted with eight OC patients who refused hospital-based treatment, eight family members involved in decision-making, and three oral surgeons. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, translated into English, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Emergent themes were subsequently interpreted in relation to HBM constructs using abductive, theory-informed pattern matching. Methodological rigour was enhanced through data source triangulation and member checking. RESULTS: From the 19 in-depth interviews, we identified seven interconnected themes underlying treatment refusal: perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, self-efficacy, cues to action, and religious beliefs. Treatment refusal was shaped by fatalistic perceptions of cancer incurability, intense fears of treatment-related harm, and substantial financial, access, and role-related constraints. Strong family influence and trust in traditional and complementary medicine further reinforced these decisions. Religious interpretations functioned bidirectionally, reinforcing acceptance of divine destiny and legitimizing nonbiomedical healing pathways, while in some cases also supporting treatment-seeking through religious doctrine. CONCLUSION: Refusal of hospital-based OC treatment reflects a culturally embedded decision-making process shaped by interacting sociocultural, religious, and structural factors. The findings support the applicability of the HBM in this context and inform the development of culturally responsive, communication-focused interventions in oral oncology. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Recognition of belief-driven treatment refusal can help clinicians tailor communication, address fears of treatment harm, and engage family and religious influences to improve acceptance of hospital-based OC care.

International Dental JournalVol. 76(5)
Prince of Songkla University (TH)
Graduate School, Prince of Songkla University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.