Body mass index, nutritional knowledge, and eating attitudes in dancer and non-dancer students

BACKGROUND: This cross-sectional comparative study examined differences in body mass index (BMI), nutritional knowledge, and eating behaviors between dancer and non-dancer university students. Given the physical and aesthetic demands of dance, understanding potential differences in health-related characteristics in this population is of particular importance. METHODS: Seventy female undergraduates (35 dancers and 35 non-dancers, aged 17-22 years) were recruited. Height, weight, and BMI were measured using the InBody 970 analyzer. Nutritional knowledge was assessed using the Chinese version of the General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire (C-GNKQ), and disordered eating risk was evaluated using the Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26)©. Group differences were analyzed using independent t-tests, with effect sizes (Cohen's d) calculated to estimate the magnitude of differences. RESULTS: Dancers were significantly taller than non-dancers (P = 0.003, d = 0.74) and had a lower BMI (P = 0.023, d = 0.82). No statistically significant difference was observed in overall C-GNKQ scores (P = 0.128, d = 0.37), although dancers scored higher in the dietary knowledge subscale (P = 0.037, d = 0.52). EAT-26© scores were higher in dancers, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.147, d = 0.35). Additional Spearman correlation analyses revealed no significant associations among BMI, C-GNKQ scores, and EAT-26© scores (P > 0.05).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Research Notes
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-026-07932-1
Primary Topic
Diversity and Impact of Dance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Body mass index, nutritional knowledge, and eating attitudes in dancer and non-dancer students

Hui Wang, Caifang Qiu
BMC Research Notes
Diversity and Impact of Dance
article

Body mass index, nutritional knowledge, and eating attitudes in dancer and non-dancer students

Hui Wang, Caifang Qiu
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This cross-sectional comparative study examined differences in body mass index (BMI), nutritional knowledge, and eating behaviors between dancer and non-dancer university students. Given the physical and aesthetic demands of dance, understanding potential differences in health-related characteristics in this population is of particular importance. METHODS: Seventy female undergraduates (35 dancers and 35 non-dancers, aged 17-22 years) were recruited. Height, weight, and BMI were measured using the InBody 970 analyzer. Nutritional knowledge was assessed using the Chinese version of the General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire (C-GNKQ), and disordered eating risk was evaluated using the Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26)©. Group differences were analyzed using independent t-tests, with effect sizes (Cohen's d) calculated to estimate the magnitude of differences. RESULTS: Dancers were significantly taller than non-dancers (P = 0.003, d = 0.74) and had a lower BMI (P = 0.023, d = 0.82). No statistically significant difference was observed in overall C-GNKQ scores (P = 0.128, d = 0.37), although dancers scored higher in the dietary knowledge subscale (P = 0.037, d = 0.52). EAT-26© scores were higher in dancers, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.147, d = 0.35). Additional Spearman correlation analyses revealed no significant associations among BMI, C-GNKQ scores, and EAT-26© scores (P > 0.05).

BMC Research Notes
Nantong University (CN), Shanghai Normal University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Diversity and Impact of Dance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.