Accurate focal‐plane selection is crucial for artificial intelligence assessment of three‐dimensional urine cytology specimens for bladder cancer screening and surveillance

BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer is a common and highly recurrent malignancy requiring lifelong surveillance. Urine cytology serves as a noninvasive triage tool to guide cystoscopy but is limited by variable sensitivity and manual review. Although deep learning enables quantitative cell-level assessment, limited work has examined three-dimensional urine cytology preparations (e.g., SurePath) containing residual cellular fragments, where restricting analysis to a single nominal focal plane may obscure diagnostically relevant features. This study aimed to quantify focal-plane heterogeneity, measure degradation of nuclear-to-cytoplasmic (NC) ratio and nuclear area estimates off plane, and evaluate focal-plane selection algorithms for performance recovery. METHODS: A total of 325 SurePath whole-slide images scanned as 11-plane Z-stacks were analyzed that spanned negative through high-grade urothelial carcinoma cases. A detection model identified cells and clusters across planes, and 343 clusters (2435 urothelial cells) were reannotated at the optimal nuclear and cytoplasmic focal depths. Classical focus metrics and vision-transformer models were evaluated for focal-plane prediction. A U-Net segmentation model generated NC ratios and nuclear areas, and Spearman correlations compared annotated and predicted measurements across optimal, off-plane, and algorithm-selected conditions. RESULTS: Focal-plane prediction accuracy ranged from 42% to 88%, with classical focus metrics outperforming deep-learning approaches. NC ratio correlation was 0.774 at optimal focus and declined progressively off plane (∼0.50 at ±5 planes). Algorithm-selected planes partially recovered performance (up to 0.748). Similar trends were observed for nuclear area estimation. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate focal-plane selection is critical for artificial intelligence-based assessment of three-dimensional urine cytology. Future work will extend this analysis to cluster- and patient-level outcomes in multi-institutional validation studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Cytopathology
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.70117
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accurate focal‐plane selection is crucial for artificial intelligence assessment of three‐dimensional urine cytology specimens for bladder cancer screening and surveillance

Samuel E. Harvey, 金銀仙, Minh‐Khang Le, Joshua Levy et al.
Cancer Cytopathology
AI in cancer detection
article

Accurate focal‐plane selection is crucial for artificial intelligence assessment of three‐dimensional urine cytology specimens for bladder cancer screening and surveillance

Samuel E. Harvey, 金銀仙, Minh‐Khang Le, Joshua Levy, Christopher J. VandenBussche, Keluo Yao, Camille Ng, Ahmad Kohsar, Yoseph Sayegh, I-Chuang Liao, Daniel Shou, Brody McNutt, Louis J. Vaickus, Xiaoying Liu, Michael Yu
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer is a common and highly recurrent malignancy requiring lifelong surveillance. Urine cytology serves as a noninvasive triage tool to guide cystoscopy but is limited by variable sensitivity and manual review. Although deep learning enables quantitative cell-level assessment, limited work has examined three-dimensional urine cytology preparations (e.g., SurePath) containing residual cellular fragments, where restricting analysis to a single nominal focal plane may obscure diagnostically relevant features. This study aimed to quantify focal-plane heterogeneity, measure degradation of nuclear-to-cytoplasmic (NC) ratio and nuclear area estimates off plane, and evaluate focal-plane selection algorithms for performance recovery. METHODS: A total of 325 SurePath whole-slide images scanned as 11-plane Z-stacks were analyzed that spanned negative through high-grade urothelial carcinoma cases. A detection model identified cells and clusters across planes, and 343 clusters (2435 urothelial cells) were reannotated at the optimal nuclear and cytoplasmic focal depths. Classical focus metrics and vision-transformer models were evaluated for focal-plane prediction. A U-Net segmentation model generated NC ratios and nuclear areas, and Spearman correlations compared annotated and predicted measurements across optimal, off-plane, and algorithm-selected conditions. RESULTS: Focal-plane prediction accuracy ranged from 42% to 88%, with classical focus metrics outperforming deep-learning approaches. NC ratio correlation was 0.774 at optimal focus and declined progressively off plane (∼0.50 at ±5 planes). Algorithm-selected planes partially recovered performance (up to 0.748). Similar trends were observed for nuclear area estimation. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate focal-plane selection is critical for artificial intelligence-based assessment of three-dimensional urine cytology. Future work will extend this analysis to cluster- and patient-level outcomes in multi-institutional validation studies.

Cancer CytopathologyVol. 134(7)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center (US)
National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.