Clinical outcomes after the implementation of a patient-centered care program applied to newly admitted people with HIV in Mexico City: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Although antiretroviral therapy (ART) has improved life expectancy in people living with HIV (PWH), sustained HIV care remains a critical challenge. The Newly Admitted Patients Program (NAPP), a local Patient-Centered Care (PCC) intervention, was implemented for patients admitted via the HIV clinic. We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes (loss to follow-up (LTFU), hospitalization, treatment discontinuation (TD), virologic failure, and mortality) among participants in NAPP versus non-participants (No-NAPP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary-care center, including PWH from January 2015 to December 2023. Participants were followed from enrollment in the HIV clinic to their last visit. Clinical, demographic, and laboratory variables were analyzed, and adjusted logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: We included 758 participants: 387 (51.1%) in the NAPP group and 371 (48.9%) in No-NAPP. NAPP participants were younger (median age 32 vs. 37 years, p < 0.01), more often MSM (78% vs. 70.1%, p = 0.04), and education levels differed (p = 0.014), though university/postgraduate attainment was similar between groups (53.7% vs. 55.8%). At follow-up, the NAPP group had lower rates of LTFU (10.9% vs. 27.8%, p < 0.01), hospitalization (21.9% vs. 32.6% p < 0.01), and mortality (3.4% vs. 8.9%, p < 0.01). NAPP participation was independently associated with reduced risk of LTFU (OR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.22-0.49), hospitalization (OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.44-0.86), and death (OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.21-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar virological and immunological characteristics at baseline, those who participated in NAPP intervention experienced fewer unfavorable clinical outcomes, highlighting the importance of PCC programs in improving health outcomes for PWH.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIDS Research and Therapy
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-026-00916-y
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical outcomes after the implementation of a patient-centered care program applied to newly admitted people with HIV in Mexico City: a retrospective cohort study

Brenda Crabtree‐Ramírez, Yanink Caro‐Vega, Álvaro López-Íñiguez, Héctor Rivera-Villegas et al.
AIDS Research and Therapy
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Clinical outcomes after the implementation of a patient-centered care program applied to newly admitted people with HIV in Mexico City: a retrospective cohort study

Brenda Crabtree‐Ramírez, Yanink Caro‐Vega, Álvaro López-Íñiguez, Héctor Rivera-Villegas, Jessica Mejía-Castrejón, Ana Paula Villalobos-Hernandez, Tavata Bejarano Colina, Roxana Claudia Iquize Condori, Sharon Daniela Ortiz Valdespino
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although antiretroviral therapy (ART) has improved life expectancy in people living with HIV (PWH), sustained HIV care remains a critical challenge. The Newly Admitted Patients Program (NAPP), a local Patient-Centered Care (PCC) intervention, was implemented for patients admitted via the HIV clinic. We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes (loss to follow-up (LTFU), hospitalization, treatment discontinuation (TD), virologic failure, and mortality) among participants in NAPP versus non-participants (No-NAPP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary-care center, including PWH from January 2015 to December 2023. Participants were followed from enrollment in the HIV clinic to their last visit. Clinical, demographic, and laboratory variables were analyzed, and adjusted logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: We included 758 participants: 387 (51.1%) in the NAPP group and 371 (48.9%) in No-NAPP. NAPP participants were younger (median age 32 vs. 37 years, p < 0.01), more often MSM (78% vs. 70.1%, p = 0.04), and education levels differed (p = 0.014), though university/postgraduate attainment was similar between groups (53.7% vs. 55.8%). At follow-up, the NAPP group had lower rates of LTFU (10.9% vs. 27.8%, p < 0.01), hospitalization (21.9% vs. 32.6% p < 0.01), and mortality (3.4% vs. 8.9%, p < 0.01). NAPP participation was independently associated with reduced risk of LTFU (OR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.22-0.49), hospitalization (OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.44-0.86), and death (OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.21-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar virological and immunological characteristics at baseline, those who participated in NAPP intervention experienced fewer unfavorable clinical outcomes, highlighting the importance of PCC programs in improving health outcomes for PWH.

AIDS Research and Therapy
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (MX)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.