Validating predictive models on EHRs data : lessons learnt from the NCDR-IMPACT-score applied on a French cardiac catheterization cohort

OBJECTIVE: We present a natural language processing pipeline to extract and re-compute a pre-existing score, the IMPACT-score, in a children's hospital belonging to the APHP hospitals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Predictive variables and adverse events occurrences were extracted from the EHR of each patient. Data extraction involved rule-based and machine learning approaches depending on the format of the data. The machine learning text-classifiers were trained on active learning annotated dataset. Once the registry was automatically populated, we computed the IMPACT-score model in our patients and we performed a logistic regression analysis to find the specific odd ratio fitting our cohort and obtain the IMPACT-score-Necker. RESULTS: We extracted clinical data from 2,980 patients. When applied to our hospital cohort, the IMPACT-score-Necker achieved an AUC of 0.719 whereas the original IMPACT-score achieved an AUC of 0.642. As a reminder, the IMPACT-score achieved an AUC of 0.752 in the NCDR-IMPACT validation cohort. DISCUSSION: Local calibration of the IMPACT-score on our cohort enhanced predictive accuracy, improving the AUC from 0.642 to 0.719, and addressing differences between our population and the original NCDR-IMPACT cohort. This reinforces the need for model adaptation to local data, as patient demographic and clinical variations can significantly impact performance. Local EHR data warehouses could be leveraged for recalibration and continuous monitoring, ensuring that AI tools remain accurate, ethical, and practical for clinicians in their clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Our results underscore the need for real-world model validation, and EHRs offer a reliable source for training and validating AI models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-06065-4
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validating predictive models on EHRs data : lessons learnt from the NCDR-IMPACT-score applied on a French cardiac catheterization cohort

A Neuraz, A Burgun, S Quennelle, N Garcelon et al.
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Validating predictive models on EHRs data : lessons learnt from the NCDR-IMPACT-score applied on a French cardiac catheterization cohort

A Neuraz, A Burgun, S Quennelle, N Garcelon, D Bonnet, S Malekzadeh-Milani
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We present a natural language processing pipeline to extract and re-compute a pre-existing score, the IMPACT-score, in a children's hospital belonging to the APHP hospitals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Predictive variables and adverse events occurrences were extracted from the EHR of each patient. Data extraction involved rule-based and machine learning approaches depending on the format of the data. The machine learning text-classifiers were trained on active learning annotated dataset. Once the registry was automatically populated, we computed the IMPACT-score model in our patients and we performed a logistic regression analysis to find the specific odd ratio fitting our cohort and obtain the IMPACT-score-Necker. RESULTS: We extracted clinical data from 2,980 patients. When applied to our hospital cohort, the IMPACT-score-Necker achieved an AUC of 0.719 whereas the original IMPACT-score achieved an AUC of 0.642. As a reminder, the IMPACT-score achieved an AUC of 0.752 in the NCDR-IMPACT validation cohort. DISCUSSION: Local calibration of the IMPACT-score on our cohort enhanced predictive accuracy, improving the AUC from 0.642 to 0.719, and addressing differences between our population and the original NCDR-IMPACT cohort. This reinforces the need for model adaptation to local data, as patient demographic and clinical variations can significantly impact performance. Local EHR data warehouses could be leveraged for recalibration and continuous monitoring, ensuring that AI tools remain accurate, ethical, and practical for clinicians in their clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Our results underscore the need for real-world model validation, and EHRs offer a reliable source for training and validating AI models.

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades (FR), Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR), Inserm (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers (FR), Institut des Maladies Génétiques Imagine (FR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.