Threats and harassment of Swedish journalists, 10 years on: Coping processes and coping strategies

Based on an in-depth interview study of a strategic sample of Swedish journalists ( n = 20), this article analyzes the coping processes and coping strategies of these journalists when faced with threats and harassment. The paper also presents data on new forms of harassment against a backdrop of developments over the past decade. The analysis uses Lazarus and Folkman’s (1984) theory of stress and coping in combination with Latack, Kinicki & Prussia’s (1995) integrative process model for coping. The coping process is analyzed as beginning with an appraisal phase, then a set of intervening factors (coping goals, coping resources and coping efficacy) before applying one or more coping strategies (which we have divided into problem-focused, emotion-focused, meaning-focused, and future-focused strategies), followed by the creation of (positive and negative) feedback loops. We find a common pattern of engaging in emotion-focused and meaning-focused coping in the first instance, shifting to problem-focused and future-focused coping when the earlier attempts do not work. We further find that the investigative journalists in our sample are more used to harassment and therefore utilize available coping resources better and use a wider range of coping strategies than other interviewees. Implications of our findings are discussed in the concluding section.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849261466370
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Threats and harassment of Swedish journalists, 10 years on: Coping processes and coping strategies

Henrik Örnebring, Monica Löfgren Nilsson
Journalism
Media Studies and Communication
article

Threats and harassment of Swedish journalists, 10 years on: Coping processes and coping strategies

Henrik Örnebring, Monica Löfgren Nilsson
article en

Abstract

Based on an in-depth interview study of a strategic sample of Swedish journalists ( n = 20), this article analyzes the coping processes and coping strategies of these journalists when faced with threats and harassment. The paper also presents data on new forms of harassment against a backdrop of developments over the past decade. The analysis uses Lazarus and Folkman’s (1984) theory of stress and coping in combination with Latack, Kinicki & Prussia’s (1995) integrative process model for coping. The coping process is analyzed as beginning with an appraisal phase, then a set of intervening factors (coping goals, coping resources and coping efficacy) before applying one or more coping strategies (which we have divided into problem-focused, emotion-focused, meaning-focused, and future-focused strategies), followed by the creation of (positive and negative) feedback loops. We find a common pattern of engaging in emotion-focused and meaning-focused coping in the first instance, shifting to problem-focused and future-focused coping when the earlier attempts do not work. We further find that the investigative journalists in our sample are more used to harassment and therefore utilize available coping resources better and use a wider range of coping strategies than other interviewees. Implications of our findings are discussed in the concluding section.

Journalism
Karlstad University (SE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.