Challenges in estimating wolf population size using spatial count models and camera trap data

Accurate abundance estimates are essential for wildlife conservation but remain difficult to obtain for wide-ranging and elusive species. Camera-traps (CT) are one of the most popular tools to study wildlife. However, the usefulness of CT data to estimate population sizes for species without individual marks remains debated. Several statistical methods showed promise in simulation studies, but researchers urged caution, and large-scale applicability remains unclear. This work aims to evaluate the use of Bayesian Spatial Count (SC) models to estimate the wolf ( Canis lupus ) population size in the Italian Alps using CT data collected through an opportunistic sampling design. A total of 755 CT were deployed across the entire range of occurrence during 2020/2021. Thanks to the availability of independent abundance estimates during the same period, we were able to investigate the effect of including prior information on the quality of large-scale population size estimates. SC models failed to provide accurate population size estimates, largely overestimating abundance, especially when using non-informative priors. While including informative priors on the effect of density covariates slightly improved estimates, providing informative priors for the spatial scale parameter led to no improvement, contrary to previous suggestions. Our findings highlighted the importance of using an adequate sampling design and accounting for individual heterogeneity in detectability within the population. Overall, SC models based on CT data seem not yet suitable for large-scale monitoring of unmarked, socially structured species like wolves, but improved sampling designs and methodological advances may increase their applicability for cost-effective population assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2026.111988
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges in estimating wolf population size using spatial count models and camera trap data

L. Corlatti, S. Filacorda, O. Friard, M. Tomasella et al.
Biological Conservation
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Challenges in estimating wolf population size using spatial count models and camera trap data

L. Corlatti, S. Filacorda, O. Friard, M. Tomasella, F. Marucco, S. Carolfi, F. Truc, E. Pernechele, S. Calderola, P. Ferrari, C. Chioso, D. Righetti, U. Fattori, G. Bombieri, R. Bischof, M. Geary, A. von Hardenberg, E. Avanzinelli, P. Molinari, F. Bisi, P. Dupont, M.V. Boiani
article en

Abstract

Accurate abundance estimates are essential for wildlife conservation but remain difficult to obtain for wide-ranging and elusive species. Camera-traps (CT) are one of the most popular tools to study wildlife. However, the usefulness of CT data to estimate population sizes for species without individual marks remains debated. Several statistical methods showed promise in simulation studies, but researchers urged caution, and large-scale applicability remains unclear. This work aims to evaluate the use of Bayesian Spatial Count (SC) models to estimate the wolf ( Canis lupus ) population size in the Italian Alps using CT data collected through an opportunistic sampling design. A total of 755 CT were deployed across the entire range of occurrence during 2020/2021. Thanks to the availability of independent abundance estimates during the same period, we were able to investigate the effect of including prior information on the quality of large-scale population size estimates. SC models failed to provide accurate population size estimates, largely overestimating abundance, especially when using non-informative priors. While including informative priors on the effect of density covariates slightly improved estimates, providing informative priors for the spatial scale parameter led to no improvement, contrary to previous suggestions. Our findings highlighted the importance of using an adequate sampling design and accounting for individual heterogeneity in detectability within the population. Overall, SC models based on CT data seem not yet suitable for large-scale monitoring of unmarked, socially structured species like wolves, but improved sampling designs and methodological advances may increase their applicability for cost-effective population assessment.

Biological ConservationVol. 321
University of Insubria (IT), University of Udine (IT), University of Chester (GB), University of Freiburg (DE), University of Pavia (IT), Parco Nazionale d'Abruzzo (IT), Ospedale di Bolzano (IT), Museo delle Scienze (IT), Provincia Autonoma di Trento (IT), Arca Progetti (Italy) (IT), Regione del Veneto (IT), Environment Park (IT), Osservatorio Astronomico della Regione Autonoma Valle d'Aosta (IT), Istituto di Genomica Applicata (IT), Dipartimento della Protezione Civile (IT), Fondazione Lombardia per l’Ambiente (IT), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO), University of Turin (IT)
Norges Forskningsråd, LIFE programme
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.