Mapping the Landscape of AI Governance in China: A Literature Review of Academic Discourse (2015–2025)

This study systematically reviews Chinese academic discourse on AI governance by analyzing 3,633 Chinese-language articles published in core academic journals between 2015 and 2025. Combining LDA topic modeling with qualitative thematic interpretation, the study identifies five major thematic clusters: legal institutionalization of AI governance and accountability, corporate responsibility and data–copyright compliance, algorithmic power and human-centered ethics, platform-mediated risks and generative AI governance, and geopolitical competition in global AI governance. The analysis further reveals that Chinese AI governance scholarship has developed several interconnected regulatory logics, including multi-actor collaborative governance, the expansion of governance objects from data and algorithms to generative AI systems, lifecycle-based regulatory interventions, and agile and distributed governance pathways. The findings suggest that, although normative and policy-oriented discussions have become increasingly sophisticated, the field still faces structural limitations in conceptual clarity, empirical validation, and policy implementation. Building on these findings, this article proposes a future research agenda centered on conceptual clarification, theoretical integration, empirical evaluation, and closer attention to implementation dynamics. By mapping the thematic structure and analytical orientations of Chinese AI governance research, the study contributes to a more systematic understanding of how Chinese scholarship conceptualizes the governance challenges posed by rapidly evolving AI technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Media Technology and Governance
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29777984261458273
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the Landscape of AI Governance in China: A Literature Review of Academic Discourse (2015–2025)

Peiying Wu, Changfeng Chen
Media Technology and Governance
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Mapping the Landscape of AI Governance in China: A Literature Review of Academic Discourse (2015–2025)

Peiying Wu, Changfeng Chen
article en

Abstract

This study systematically reviews Chinese academic discourse on AI governance by analyzing 3,633 Chinese-language articles published in core academic journals between 2015 and 2025. Combining LDA topic modeling with qualitative thematic interpretation, the study identifies five major thematic clusters: legal institutionalization of AI governance and accountability, corporate responsibility and data–copyright compliance, algorithmic power and human-centered ethics, platform-mediated risks and generative AI governance, and geopolitical competition in global AI governance. The analysis further reveals that Chinese AI governance scholarship has developed several interconnected regulatory logics, including multi-actor collaborative governance, the expansion of governance objects from data and algorithms to generative AI systems, lifecycle-based regulatory interventions, and agile and distributed governance pathways. The findings suggest that, although normative and policy-oriented discussions have become increasingly sophisticated, the field still faces structural limitations in conceptual clarity, empirical validation, and policy implementation. Building on these findings, this article proposes a future research agenda centered on conceptual clarification, theoretical integration, empirical evaluation, and closer attention to implementation dynamics. By mapping the thematic structure and analytical orientations of Chinese AI governance research, the study contributes to a more systematic understanding of how Chinese scholarship conceptualizes the governance challenges posed by rapidly evolving AI technologies.

Media Technology and Governance
Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.