Frameworks That Inform Professionals’ Communication and Early Support for Childhood Adversities: A Scoping Review

Adverse experiences during childhood such as family violence, neglect, poverty, poor parental mental or physical health have negative immediate and lifelong impacts on children's health and development. Although many families experience adversities, families experience barriers to seeking support, and many professionals lack confidence to have sensitive conversations with these families. Aiming to inform the development of resources to guide professionals, we undertook a scoping review to (1) identify and describe communication frameworks for professionals and (2) describe if/how they were evaluated. Searches were conducted in Medline, Emcare, PsycInfo, Cumulative Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Scopus from inception to January 2025. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), we located 15 communication frameworks contained within 33 manuscripts. Key characteristics of the communication frameworks are presented, such as practice setting and intended users, which adversities were addressed and how they were evaluated. There were two broad types of communication framework, those which required professionals to actively screen and respond to family adversities, and those which provided opportunistic guidance and response without explicit screening. Most communication frameworks were in the global north, and many were not evaluated beyond their initial context. We could not locate any communication frameworks embedded within non-health-related settings, and none comprehensively addressed all adverse experiences known to impact children. Nonetheless, this review identified available evidence that can help inform tailoring and development of communication frameworks to build professionals' capacity for early intervention for family adversities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trauma Violence & Abuse
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380261451787
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frameworks That Inform Professionals’ Communication and Early Support for Childhood Adversities: A Scoping Review

Lauren Lines, Amelia Winter, Susan Platt, Sarah Seekamp et al.
Trauma Violence & Abuse
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

Frameworks That Inform Professionals’ Communication and Early Support for Childhood Adversities: A Scoping Review

Lauren Lines, Amelia Winter, Susan Platt, Sarah Seekamp, Sarah Hunter
article en

Abstract

Adverse experiences during childhood such as family violence, neglect, poverty, poor parental mental or physical health have negative immediate and lifelong impacts on children's health and development. Although many families experience adversities, families experience barriers to seeking support, and many professionals lack confidence to have sensitive conversations with these families. Aiming to inform the development of resources to guide professionals, we undertook a scoping review to (1) identify and describe communication frameworks for professionals and (2) describe if/how they were evaluated. Searches were conducted in Medline, Emcare, PsycInfo, Cumulative Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Scopus from inception to January 2025. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), we located 15 communication frameworks contained within 33 manuscripts. Key characteristics of the communication frameworks are presented, such as practice setting and intended users, which adversities were addressed and how they were evaluated. There were two broad types of communication framework, those which required professionals to actively screen and respond to family adversities, and those which provided opportunistic guidance and response without explicit screening. Most communication frameworks were in the global north, and many were not evaluated beyond their initial context. We could not locate any communication frameworks embedded within non-health-related settings, and none comprehensively addressed all adverse experiences known to impact children. Nonetheless, this review identified available evidence that can help inform tailoring and development of communication frameworks to build professionals' capacity for early intervention for family adversities.

Trauma Violence & Abuse
Flinders University (AU), Auckland University of Technology (NZ), The University of Adelaide (AU), Australian Catholic University (AU)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.