Temporal and spatial transferability in telemetry-based dynamic species distribution models: The effects of algorithms and pseudo-absence techniques
Species distribution models using animal tracking data to predict foraging habitat suitability can inform dynamic ocean management techniques that respond to changing environmental conditions. Such models require accurate transferability in time (and sometimes space), often involving extrapolation into new environmental conditions. However, the impacts of modelling configuration on transferability are unclear. Here we built species distribution models using animal tracking studies from the Southern Ocean and projected them in time and space. We tested 24 different model configurations to assess how the choice of pseudo-absence technique and algorithm influences temporal and spatial transferability. Using data from a variety of seabird and marine mammal species with differing ecological traits, we aimed to identify 1) which model configurations produce consistently high transferability scores and 2) whether any tested algorithms or pseudo-absence techniques were better equipped to deal with environmental extrapolation and small sample sizes. Models consistently achieved high temporal transferability scores. Of all tested configurations, background sampling combined with tree-based machine learning algorithms or models accounting for autocorrelation performed best in this context. Conversely, no model configuration consistently attained high spatial transferability scores, with all exhibiting poor predictive capacity in many cases. The impacts of environmental extrapolation and sample size on transferability were also assessed. Most models exhibited greater temporal transferability when built with larger datasets that required lesser environmental extrapolation. We recommend that researchers use data-rich ensembles of the most reliable algorithms built with background sampling when looking to predict near real-time distributions and, where possible, avoid spatial extrapolation when data do not cover every population within the target area.
Authors
- Mark Andrew Hindell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7823-7185)
- Philip N. Trathan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6673-9930)
- Horst Bornemann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0230-1881)
- Daniel P. Costa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0233-5782)
- Yan Ropert‐Coudert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6494-5300)
- Ryan R Reisinger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8933-6875)
- Luciano Dalla Rosa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1583-6471)
- Silvia Olmastroni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9319-9914)
- Hugh J. Venables (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6445-8462)
- Joshua C. Wilson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2472-5521)
- Louise Emmerson
- Colin Southwell
- Simon Goldsworthy
- Michael E Goebel
- Ari S Friedlaender
- Mônica M C Muelbert
- Mary-Anne Lea
- Rochelle Constantine
Institutions
- University of Siena (IT)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (BR)
- Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (DE)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- British Antarctic Survey (GB)
- Australian Antarctic Division (AU)
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
- National Oceanography Centre (GB)
- South Australian Research and Development Institute (AU)
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (FR)
- University of Southampton (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Ecological Modelling
- Published
- 2026-06-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2026.111702
- Primary Topic
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Natural Environment Research Council