Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Detection of Intracranial Haemorrhage on Non-contrast CT Head: A Systematic Review

Intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) is a life-threatening condition requiring rapid diagnosis to improve clinical outcomes. Non-contrast computed tomography (CT) is the primary imaging modality; however, increasing workload and diagnostic variability may lead to delays. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a potential tool to enhance detection. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of AI algorithms for detecting ICH on non-contrast CT. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) guidelines, and the research protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261320521). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, CENTRAL, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar was performed. Diagnostic accuracy studies assessing AI-based detection of ICH on CT were included. Data extraction and study selection were conducted independently. Validated tools, including Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), were additionally utilised to assess risk of bias and certainty of evidence. A total of 25,528 records were identified through database searching (PubMed: 392; Google Scholar: 17,900; ScienceDirect: 7,218; Cochrane Library: 18). A total of eight studies, which met the inclusion criteria, were included, demonstrating variability in AI models, datasets, and validation methods. Overall, AI algorithms showed high diagnostic performance, with sensitivities ranging from 0.73 to 0.95 and specificities from 0.80 to 0.98. Studies using larger datasets reported higher accuracy. However, heterogeneity in study design and reference standards was significant. AI demonstrates promising diagnostic accuracy for ICH detection, particularly as a triage tool. However, variability and low-quality evidence limit generalizability. AI should be used alongside radiologists, with further prospective studies required before widespread clinical implementation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.111617
Primary Topic
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Detection of Intracranial Haemorrhage on Non-contrast CT Head: A Systematic Review

Anusha Chitravanshi, Ashwin Umasankar, Indrajit Banerjee, Heramba Vigneshwar Sachithananthan
Cureus
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
article

Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Detection of Intracranial Haemorrhage on Non-contrast CT Head: A Systematic Review

Anusha Chitravanshi, Ashwin Umasankar, Indrajit Banerjee, Heramba Vigneshwar Sachithananthan
article en

Abstract

Intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) is a life-threatening condition requiring rapid diagnosis to improve clinical outcomes. Non-contrast computed tomography (CT) is the primary imaging modality; however, increasing workload and diagnostic variability may lead to delays. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a potential tool to enhance detection. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of AI algorithms for detecting ICH on non-contrast CT. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) guidelines, and the research protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261320521). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, CENTRAL, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar was performed. Diagnostic accuracy studies assessing AI-based detection of ICH on CT were included. Data extraction and study selection were conducted independently. Validated tools, including Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), were additionally utilised to assess risk of bias and certainty of evidence. A total of 25,528 records were identified through database searching (PubMed: 392; Google Scholar: 17,900; ScienceDirect: 7,218; Cochrane Library: 18). A total of eight studies, which met the inclusion criteria, were included, demonstrating variability in AI models, datasets, and validation methods. Overall, AI algorithms showed high diagnostic performance, with sensitivities ranging from 0.73 to 0.95 and specificities from 0.80 to 0.98. Studies using larger datasets reported higher accuracy. However, heterogeneity in study design and reference standards was significant. AI demonstrates promising diagnostic accuracy for ICH detection, particularly as a triage tool. However, variability and low-quality evidence limit generalizability. AI should be used alongside radiologists, with further prospective studies required before widespread clinical implementation.

Cureus
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.