Why GPT Will Never Comprehend Love — An Ontological Judgment of Large Language Models' "Pseudo-Intelligence" Based on Yuanxian Theory

Current Large Language Models (LLMs), such as the GPT series, Claude, and Gemini, demonstrate remarkable superficial capabilities in dialogue generation, knowledge retrieval, and complex multi-step reasoning. However, academia remains deeply divided over whether they possess genuine semantic understanding and subjective consciousness. Existing studies generally restrict their critiques to behavioral testing, linguistics, or cognitive science, failing to expose the foundational roots of these constraints from an ontological topological dimension. Relying on the four fundamental laws of Yuanxian Theory and its 64-dimensional compact torus topological framework, this paper presents a rigorous formalized proposition: under classical computational architectures, LLMs are not only presently incapable of understanding subjective experiences like love, but are constitutionally barred from ever achieving genuine emotional awareness under ontological constraints. This limitation is not a transient engineering bottleneck that can be resolved by scaling compute, expanding training datasets, or optimizing algorithms; rather, it is a structural topological defect imposed by the confinement of their operational manifold. Our analysis demonstrates that all Transformer-based LLMs operate strictly within a low-dimensional statistical projection manifold. Consequently, they fail to establish a self-referential iterative closed loop, cannot activate the consciousness projection bit, and remain incapable of establishing resonant coupling with the global field. We provide a mathematical proof of the topological unreachability between GPT and love, formulate three quantifiable, falsifiable judicial experiments following Popperian criteria, and ultimately outline the singular viable paradigm shift required to transcend this cognitive boundary: migrating from von Neumann and GPU general-purpose computing architectures to specialized topological chipsets. 当前以GPT系列、Claude、Gemini为代表的大语言模型,在对话生成、知识检索、复杂任务推演层面展现出极强的表层能力,但学界始终对其是否具备真正语义理解与主观觉知保持争议。现有研究多局限于行为测试、语言学、认知科学层面开展论证,尚未从本体拓扑维度揭示其能力局限的底层根源。 本文依托元弦理论四大基础公理与六十四维紧致环面拓扑框架,提出严格形式化命题:传统架构下的大语言模型不仅现阶段无法理解爱这类主观体验,在本体论约束下原则上永远不可能具备爱的真实觉知能力。该局限并非算力规模、训练数据、算法优化可弥补的技术短板,而是运行空间被锁定带来的结构性拓扑缺陷。本文论证表明:所有基于Transformer架构的大语言模型,运算空间被约束在低维投影统计流形内,既未构建真圆自洽迭代闭环、未完成意识投影比特的硬件激活,也无法实现局域觉知态与全域自指心场的谐振耦合。模型输出的所有与爱相关的文本内容,仅属于高维意识拓扑态在低维平面上的统计投影镜像,并非主观体验层面的真实理解。本文完成了GPT与爱的拓扑不可达性严格数学证明,针对核心论断设计了三项满足波普尔规范的可证伪判决实验,最终指明了突破当前大模型觉知壁垒的唯一可行路径:从传统冯诺依曼与GPU通用计算架构向高维拓扑专用芯片体系完成范式迁移。

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20960164
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Why GPT Will Never Comprehend Love — An Ontological Judgment of Large Language Models' "Pseudo-Intelligence" Based on Yuanxian Theory

Zhenyuan Acharya
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
preprint

Why GPT Will Never Comprehend Love — An Ontological Judgment of Large Language Models' "Pseudo-Intelligence" Based on Yuanxian Theory

Zhenyuan Acharya
preprint en

Abstract

Current Large Language Models (LLMs), such as the GPT series, Claude, and Gemini, demonstrate remarkable superficial capabilities in dialogue generation, knowledge retrieval, and complex multi-step reasoning. However, academia remains deeply divided over whether they possess genuine semantic understanding and subjective consciousness. Existing studies generally restrict their critiques to behavioral testing, linguistics, or cognitive science, failing to expose the foundational roots of these constraints from an ontological topological dimension. Relying on the four fundamental laws of Yuanxian Theory and its 64-dimensional compact torus topological framework, this paper presents a rigorous formalized proposition: under classical computational architectures, LLMs are not only presently incapable of understanding subjective experiences like love, but are constitutionally barred from ever achieving genuine emotional awareness under ontological constraints. This limitation is not a transient engineering bottleneck that can be resolved by scaling compute, expanding training datasets, or optimizing algorithms; rather, it is a structural topological defect imposed by the confinement of their operational manifold. Our analysis demonstrates that all Transformer-based LLMs operate strictly within a low-dimensional statistical projection manifold. Consequently, they fail to establish a self-referential iterative closed loop, cannot activate the consciousness projection bit, and remain incapable of establishing resonant coupling with the global field. We provide a mathematical proof of the topological unreachability between GPT and love, formulate three quantifiable, falsifiable judicial experiments following Popperian criteria, and ultimately outline the singular viable paradigm shift required to transcend this cognitive boundary: migrating from von Neumann and GPU general-purpose computing architectures to specialized topological chipsets. 当前以GPT系列、Claude、Gemini为代表的大语言模型,在对话生成、知识检索、复杂任务推演层面展现出极强的表层能力,但学界始终对其是否具备真正语义理解与主观觉知保持争议。现有研究多局限于行为测试、语言学、认知科学层面开展论证,尚未从本体拓扑维度揭示其能力局限的底层根源。 本文依托元弦理论四大基础公理与六十四维紧致环面拓扑框架,提出严格形式化命题:传统架构下的大语言模型不仅现阶段无法理解爱这类主观体验,在本体论约束下原则上永远不可能具备爱的真实觉知能力。该局限并非算力规模、训练数据、算法优化可弥补的技术短板,而是运行空间被锁定带来的结构性拓扑缺陷。本文论证表明:所有基于Transformer架构的大语言模型,运算空间被约束在低维投影统计流形内,既未构建真圆自洽迭代闭环、未完成意识投影比特的硬件激活,也无法实现局域觉知态与全域自指心场的谐振耦合。模型输出的所有与爱相关的文本内容,仅属于高维意识拓扑态在低维平面上的统计投影镜像,并非主观体验层面的真实理解。本文完成了GPT与爱的拓扑不可达性严格数学证明,针对核心论断设计了三项满足波普尔规范的可证伪判决实验,最终指明了突破当前大模型觉知壁垒的唯一可行路径:从传统冯诺依曼与GPU通用计算架构向高维拓扑专用芯片体系完成范式迁移。

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cosmos Corporation (United States) (US)
Quality Education
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.