Beyond Carbon: Nitrogen Management and the Missing Dimension in Global Fertilizer Sustainability Frameworks

Sustainability frameworks on a global scale, such as the Paris Agreement and the UN's Sustainable Development Goals, have influenced how governments currently formulate fertilizer policies, primarily from the carbon perspective. The specific effects of nitrate leaching, residual nitrogen losses and the long-term implications of these on water quality, soil health and the stability of ecosystems, have been less emphasized in international policies, and through the research that helps to inform them. There are currently no agricultural sustainability frameworks that adequately account for all environmental and social costs associated with nitrogen. This study has looked at nine different countries (China, India, USA, Brazil, EU, Denmark, Great Britain, South Africa and Australia) to see if governments are focused on carbon reduction versus the more effective management of nitrogen (through an examination of the peer-reviewed literature). A total of 38 peer-reviewed papers published between 1989 and 2026, from Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Springer Nature, MDPI, Frontiers, PLOS ONE, and Nature/Scientific Reports were examined; the policy frameworks for each of the nine countries were then reviewed and compared using a structured table. The results demonstrated that all of the countries are focused on agricultural carbon rather than nitrogen. Each of the countries studied have limited regulations on nitrate leaching, groundwater contamination, and nitrogen use efficiency even though there is a considerable amount of scientific evidence documenting their negative effects on the environment. As global fertiliser use continues to increase, the gap between scientific evidence and policy coverage has potential implications for environmental and public health. A dual carbon-nitrogen approach within international frameworks is presented as one possible direction for more complete fertiliser sustainability governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20947725
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Carbon: Nitrogen Management and the Missing Dimension in Global Fertilizer Sustainability Frameworks

Yashashwini Reddy Kambam, Pragnya Velaga, Preetham Penugonda, Tisha Nama
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Beyond Carbon: Nitrogen Management and the Missing Dimension in Global Fertilizer Sustainability Frameworks

Yashashwini Reddy Kambam, Pragnya Velaga, Preetham Penugonda, Tisha Nama
article en

Abstract

Sustainability frameworks on a global scale, such as the Paris Agreement and the UN's Sustainable Development Goals, have influenced how governments currently formulate fertilizer policies, primarily from the carbon perspective. The specific effects of nitrate leaching, residual nitrogen losses and the long-term implications of these on water quality, soil health and the stability of ecosystems, have been less emphasized in international policies, and through the research that helps to inform them. There are currently no agricultural sustainability frameworks that adequately account for all environmental and social costs associated with nitrogen. This study has looked at nine different countries (China, India, USA, Brazil, EU, Denmark, Great Britain, South Africa and Australia) to see if governments are focused on carbon reduction versus the more effective management of nitrogen (through an examination of the peer-reviewed literature). A total of 38 peer-reviewed papers published between 1989 and 2026, from Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Springer Nature, MDPI, Frontiers, PLOS ONE, and Nature/Scientific Reports were examined; the policy frameworks for each of the nine countries were then reviewed and compared using a structured table. The results demonstrated that all of the countries are focused on agricultural carbon rather than nitrogen. Each of the countries studied have limited regulations on nitrate leaching, groundwater contamination, and nitrogen use efficiency even though there is a considerable amount of scientific evidence documenting their negative effects on the environment. As global fertiliser use continues to increase, the gap between scientific evidence and policy coverage has potential implications for environmental and public health. A dual carbon-nitrogen approach within international frameworks is presented as one possible direction for more complete fertiliser sustainability governance.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Woxsen School of Business (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond Carbon: Nitrogen Management and the Missing Dimension in Global Fertilizer Sustainability Frameworks — Yashashwini Reddy Kambam, Pragnya Velaga, et al. · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS