Feasibility and Process Evaluation of CArdiac Brief INtervention (CABIN) in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Mixed-Method, Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial.

AIMS: To conduct feasibility testing and a process evaluation of CArdiac Brief INtervention (CABIN), with a preliminary assessment of impact in patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: A two-arm, parallel group, pilot randomised controlled trial with a concurrent, mixed-method design was conducted. Forty patients were recruited post-STEMI from two hospital centres in the United Kingdom (UK). Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention (CABIN) or control (usual care) group using a 1:1 allocation ratio. CABIN delivered psychoeducational support via a single, one-to-one session (approximately 20 minutes) with patients post-STEMI before hospital discharge. Feasibility and process evaluation data were collected from patients and cardiology staff. Patient-related outcomes were assessed at four timepoints (TPs): baseline, post-intervention, four weeks from diagnosis, and fourteen weeks from diagnosis. The findings demonstrated favourable recruitment (13.3 patients per month), data completeness (≥ 87.5% at each TP), and acceptability (positive feedback with no major revisions identified). Larger, favourable changes (Hedges' g > 0.8) were documented for all patient-related outcomes (disease knowledge; illness perception; anxiety and depression; and health status and confidence) in the intervention group across the TPs. All participants (100%) of the intervention sub-group enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) compared to 50% of the control sub-group. CONCLUSION: CABIN was feasible and acceptable to patients. Preliminary evidence suggests a potential, positive impact on disease knowledge, psychological wellbeing, and CR enrolment. CABIN will progress to an effectiveness and implementation evaluation, informing potential integration with routine clinical practice in the UK. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05848674.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvag157
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility and Process Evaluation of CArdiac Brief INtervention (CABIN) in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Mixed-Method, Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial.

Donna Fitzsimons, Maria Mooney, Gemma Caughers, Gareth Thompson et al.
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
article

Feasibility and Process Evaluation of CArdiac Brief INtervention (CABIN) in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Mixed-Method, Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial.

Donna Fitzsimons, Maria Mooney, Gemma Caughers, Gareth Thompson, JM Bradley, P Donnelly, Lana Dixon
article en

Abstract

AIMS: To conduct feasibility testing and a process evaluation of CArdiac Brief INtervention (CABIN), with a preliminary assessment of impact in patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: A two-arm, parallel group, pilot randomised controlled trial with a concurrent, mixed-method design was conducted. Forty patients were recruited post-STEMI from two hospital centres in the United Kingdom (UK). Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention (CABIN) or control (usual care) group using a 1:1 allocation ratio. CABIN delivered psychoeducational support via a single, one-to-one session (approximately 20 minutes) with patients post-STEMI before hospital discharge. Feasibility and process evaluation data were collected from patients and cardiology staff. Patient-related outcomes were assessed at four timepoints (TPs): baseline, post-intervention, four weeks from diagnosis, and fourteen weeks from diagnosis. The findings demonstrated favourable recruitment (13.3 patients per month), data completeness (≥ 87.5% at each TP), and acceptability (positive feedback with no major revisions identified). Larger, favourable changes (Hedges' g > 0.8) were documented for all patient-related outcomes (disease knowledge; illness perception; anxiety and depression; and health status and confidence) in the intervention group across the TPs. All participants (100%) of the intervention sub-group enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) compared to 50% of the control sub-group. CONCLUSION: CABIN was feasible and acceptable to patients. Preliminary evidence suggests a potential, positive impact on disease knowledge, psychological wellbeing, and CR enrolment. CABIN will progress to an effectiveness and implementation evaluation, informing potential integration with routine clinical practice in the UK. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05848674.

European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Belfast Health and Social Care Trust (GB), South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.