Justifying advertisements in paid streaming subscriptions: the role of perceived fairness in shaping user intentions

As streaming platforms introduce ad-supported paid subscriptions, they risk undermining user expectations of ad-free experiences. This research examines how justification framing, defined as providing explanations for the inclusion of ads, affects consumer responses. Across three experimental studies, we find that providing a justification increases perceived fairness and subscription intentions, with no significant differences observed across the levels of justification depth examined, and similar effects emerging across different types of justifications. Even minimal justifications improve user acceptance, suggesting that the presence of an explanation, rather than its elaboration, plays a central role. These findings contribute to the advertising and digital marketing literature by highlighting the importance of fairness cues in experiential disruptions within paid subscription models. They also offer practical guidance for platforms navigating communication around ad integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advertising
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2026.2694294
Primary Topic
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Justifying advertisements in paid streaming subscriptions: the role of perceived fairness in shaping user intentions

Aya Shaban, Jamel Khenfer, Sana Minhas
International Journal of Advertising
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
article

Justifying advertisements in paid streaming subscriptions: the role of perceived fairness in shaping user intentions

Aya Shaban, Jamel Khenfer, Sana Minhas
article en

Abstract

As streaming platforms introduce ad-supported paid subscriptions, they risk undermining user expectations of ad-free experiences. This research examines how justification framing, defined as providing explanations for the inclusion of ads, affects consumer responses. Across three experimental studies, we find that providing a justification increases perceived fairness and subscription intentions, with no significant differences observed across the levels of justification depth examined, and similar effects emerging across different types of justifications. Even minimal justifications improve user acceptance, suggesting that the presence of an explanation, rather than its elaboration, plays a central role. These findings contribute to the advertising and digital marketing literature by highlighting the importance of fairness cues in experiential disruptions within paid subscription models. They also offer practical guidance for platforms navigating communication around ad integration.

International Journal of Advertising
Higher Colleges of Technology (AE), Zayed University (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Justifying advertisements in paid streaming subscriptions: the role of perceived fairness in shaping user intentions — Aya Shaban, Jamel Khenfer, et al. · International Journal of Advertising (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS