The American immigration myth: the construction and reconstruction of educational possibilities

This article examines the ‘American immigration myth’, the belief that hard work and individual effort are sufficient for success, by analyzing how deficit thinking and market-driven reforms shape the schooling of immigrant and minoritized students. Drawing on critical social theory, it explores how wealth, power, nationalism, and standardized assessment can intersect to construct immigrants as deficient Others while masking structural barriers rooted in economics, race, and language. Using a critical narrative review design, qualitative thematic synthesis, critical policy/discourse analysis, and practitioner reflexivity in a New Mexico educational context, the article traces how immigration policy, high-stakes testing, and accountability systems reconceive inequality and normalize subtractive assimilation. I argue for a liberatory educational project that recognizes students’ epistemic diversity and advances a democratic vision of schooling grounded in equity and belonging. Two questions guide the analysis: How is the immigration myth constructed and reproduced in policy discourse, and what alternative educational visions challenge deficit thinking while opening liberatory possibilities for all students?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Education
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2026.2691463
Primary Topic
Critical Race Theory in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The American immigration myth: the construction and reconstruction of educational possibilities

Paulo Andreas Oemig
Cogent Education
Critical Race Theory in Education
article

The American immigration myth: the construction and reconstruction of educational possibilities

Paulo Andreas Oemig
article en

Abstract

This article examines the ‘American immigration myth’, the belief that hard work and individual effort are sufficient for success, by analyzing how deficit thinking and market-driven reforms shape the schooling of immigrant and minoritized students. Drawing on critical social theory, it explores how wealth, power, nationalism, and standardized assessment can intersect to construct immigrants as deficient Others while masking structural barriers rooted in economics, race, and language. Using a critical narrative review design, qualitative thematic synthesis, critical policy/discourse analysis, and practitioner reflexivity in a New Mexico educational context, the article traces how immigration policy, high-stakes testing, and accountability systems reconceive inequality and normalize subtractive assimilation. I argue for a liberatory educational project that recognizes students’ epistemic diversity and advances a democratic vision of schooling grounded in equity and belonging. Two questions guide the analysis: How is the immigration myth constructed and reproduced in policy discourse, and what alternative educational visions challenge deficit thinking while opening liberatory possibilities for all students?

Cogent EducationVol. 13(1)
New Mexico Space Grant Consortium (US), Department of Administration (GU)
New Mexico State University
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Critical Race Theory in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.