AI Search Citation Factors for Local Health Practices

This paper examines the factors that determine whether an independent local health practice appears in AI-generated recommendation responses across ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. Drawing on a dataset of 216 New Jersey health practices tested using standardized local search prompts, we identify the entity visibility gap as the primary barrier to AI citation for local businesses. We synthesize findings from existing literature on AI citation factors - including brand mention volume, content freshness, structured format, and schema markup - and apply them to the local health vertical. Our dataset reveals that 98% of practices scored zero across all three AI models, with no practice achieving cross-model visibility. We conclude that a single well-indexed third-party publication placement may be sufficient to generate initial AI citation presence, and that local health practices represent the most underserved segment of the AI visibility market.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20949937
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Search Citation Factors for Local Health Practices

Kevin Flores
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

AI Search Citation Factors for Local Health Practices

Kevin Flores
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the factors that determine whether an independent local health practice appears in AI-generated recommendation responses across ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. Drawing on a dataset of 216 New Jersey health practices tested using standardized local search prompts, we identify the entity visibility gap as the primary barrier to AI citation for local businesses. We synthesize findings from existing literature on AI citation factors - including brand mention volume, content freshness, structured format, and schema markup - and apply them to the local health vertical. Our dataset reveals that 98% of practices scored zero across all three AI models, with no practice achieving cross-model visibility. We conclude that a single well-indexed third-party publication placement may be sufficient to generate initial AI citation presence, and that local health practices represent the most underserved segment of the AI visibility market.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.