Determining the utility of radio frequency identification ( <scp>RFID</scp> ) technology for disaster victim identification ( <scp>DVI</scp> )

Radio frequency identification (RFID) technology was evaluated as a method for electronically tracking human remains and associated identifying information during mass fatality incidents. Conventional tags are prone to physical damage and failure, which can compromise identification processes and hinder the repatriation of bodies. Nine types of uniquely numbered RFID tags were deployed in decompositional and burial environments to assess the survivability of different types of RFID tags buried, inserted, and attached to pig carcasses. The best method of insertion or attachment to keep tags in situ, and whether physical writing in pencil or permanent marker remained on the tags' surfaces. In a series of four studies of whole carcasses, pieces of tissue, as human proxies, and burials in soil, all but two tags were determined to be viable throughout the decomposition process. All tags displayed movement issues, so bone attachment sites are recommended. Handwritten labels on the tags prepared under dry conditions and when protected from decompositional fluids held up better than writing interacting with the fluids. We found the most useful tags were the LF Yellow Ear Tag and the UHF White Tag.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70395
Primary Topic
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determining the utility of radio frequency identification ( RFID ) technology for disaster victim identification ( DVI )

Gail S. Anderson, Vienna C. Lam, Megan Bassendale, Makena P. McLean
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
article

Determining the utility of radio frequency identification ( RFID ) technology for disaster victim identification ( DVI )

Gail S. Anderson, Vienna C. Lam, Megan Bassendale, Makena P. McLean
article en

Abstract

Radio frequency identification (RFID) technology was evaluated as a method for electronically tracking human remains and associated identifying information during mass fatality incidents. Conventional tags are prone to physical damage and failure, which can compromise identification processes and hinder the repatriation of bodies. Nine types of uniquely numbered RFID tags were deployed in decompositional and burial environments to assess the survivability of different types of RFID tags buried, inserted, and attached to pig carcasses. The best method of insertion or attachment to keep tags in situ, and whether physical writing in pencil or permanent marker remained on the tags' surfaces. In a series of four studies of whole carcasses, pieces of tissue, as human proxies, and burials in soil, all but two tags were determined to be viable throughout the decomposition process. All tags displayed movement issues, so bone attachment sites are recommended. Handwritten labels on the tags prepared under dry conditions and when protected from decompositional fluids held up better than writing interacting with the fluids. We found the most useful tags were the LF Yellow Ear Tag and the UHF White Tag.

Journal of Forensic Sciences
Simon Fraser University (CA), Guardian Industries (United States) (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.