Automated Mineral Identification and Rock‐Type Classification of Lunar Mare Basalts Using SEM Images

Abstract We present an automated system for identifying minerals and classifying rock types in Apollo lunar mare basalts using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imagery. Mineral segmentation is based on a U‐Net architecture, supplemented by two scale‐aware models designed to incorporate pixel size information. We find that a single U‐Net without explicit scale input achieves performance comparable to the scale‐aware models. From a total of 17,248 augmented images (i.e., 1,078 unique base images), 12,800 were used for training, and the final model achieved average pixel‐wise accuracies of 0.85, 0.81, and 0.82 on the training, validation, and test sets, respectively. For rock classification, we constructed a separate data set by compiling reported modal mineral abundances from the literature to train both a rule‐based classifier and a Gaussian Naive Bayes model. These classifiers were then applied to modal abundances derived from the segmented images, achieving accuracies of 0.78 in distinguishing between ilmenite, pigeonite, and olivine basalts. Our framework enables rapid, scalable, first‐order mineral identification and rock classification of lunar mare basalt petrography. However, it also reveals several limitations, including challenges in identifying minor phases, the need for phase subclassification, and inaccuracies of human bias in training annotations. These limitations underscore the continued importance of expert interpretation for detailed mineralogical and petrological studies. Nevertheless, our system provides a useful baseline and benchmark with applicability to both existing Apollo collections and lunar meteorites, as well as to future returned‐sample missions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and Computation
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jh001124
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated Mineral Identification and Rock‐Type Classification of Lunar Mare Basalts Using SEM Images

Jaehong Chung, Claire Nichols, Sonia M. Tikoo-Schantz, Ji‐In Jung
Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and Computation
Planetary Science and Exploration
article

Automated Mineral Identification and Rock‐Type Classification of Lunar Mare Basalts Using SEM Images

Jaehong Chung, Claire Nichols, Sonia M. Tikoo-Schantz, Ji‐In Jung
article en

Abstract

Abstract We present an automated system for identifying minerals and classifying rock types in Apollo lunar mare basalts using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imagery. Mineral segmentation is based on a U‐Net architecture, supplemented by two scale‐aware models designed to incorporate pixel size information. We find that a single U‐Net without explicit scale input achieves performance comparable to the scale‐aware models. From a total of 17,248 augmented images (i.e., 1,078 unique base images), 12,800 were used for training, and the final model achieved average pixel‐wise accuracies of 0.85, 0.81, and 0.82 on the training, validation, and test sets, respectively. For rock classification, we constructed a separate data set by compiling reported modal mineral abundances from the literature to train both a rule‐based classifier and a Gaussian Naive Bayes model. These classifiers were then applied to modal abundances derived from the segmented images, achieving accuracies of 0.78 in distinguishing between ilmenite, pigeonite, and olivine basalts. Our framework enables rapid, scalable, first‐order mineral identification and rock classification of lunar mare basalt petrography. However, it also reveals several limitations, including challenges in identifying minor phases, the need for phase subclassification, and inaccuracies of human bias in training annotations. These limitations underscore the continued importance of expert interpretation for detailed mineralogical and petrological studies. Nevertheless, our system provides a useful baseline and benchmark with applicability to both existing Apollo collections and lunar meteorites, as well as to future returned‐sample missions.

Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and ComputationVol. 3(4)
University of Oxford (GB), Stanford University (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Planetary Science and Exploration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.