Supporting in Ways That Do Not Align With What We Feel, Believe, or Want: Theorizing About Deceptive/Reluctant Support Provision in Interpersonal Relationships

In this study, we investigate deceptive/reluctant support (D/RS), which we define as verbal and nonverbal supportive communication that is communicated unwillingly (i.e., hesitantly or against their wishes), does not align with support providers’ true feelings or beliefs (i.e., disingenuous or inauthentic), or both. In addition, relational norms and patterns of behavior specific to providers' relationships with support recipients were central to their D/RS experiences. By analyzing 22 semi-structured, narrative-focused interviews, we offer novel conceptualizations for how D/RS manifests in relationships. Our analysis indicated three defining features of D/RS: unwillingness , dishonesty , and norms . Additionally, our results provided insight into complicating contextual factors that further nuance D/RS: fear of repercussions , justification , values , networks , and isolation . This research offers insight into how support providers engage in D/RS, which could be an intermediate step between offering positive support and choosing to disengage as a support provider. Moreover, understanding how providers navigate challenges when communicating support is key as scholars strive to understand what creates satisfying supportive relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075261463317
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supporting in Ways That Do Not Align With What We Feel, Believe, or Want: Theorizing About Deceptive/Reluctant Support Provision in Interpersonal Relationships

Meara H. Faw, Joshua Pederson, Kylie J. Johnson
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

Supporting in Ways That Do Not Align With What We Feel, Believe, or Want: Theorizing About Deceptive/Reluctant Support Provision in Interpersonal Relationships

Meara H. Faw, Joshua Pederson, Kylie J. Johnson
article en

Abstract

In this study, we investigate deceptive/reluctant support (D/RS), which we define as verbal and nonverbal supportive communication that is communicated unwillingly (i.e., hesitantly or against their wishes), does not align with support providers’ true feelings or beliefs (i.e., disingenuous or inauthentic), or both. In addition, relational norms and patterns of behavior specific to providers' relationships with support recipients were central to their D/RS experiences. By analyzing 22 semi-structured, narrative-focused interviews, we offer novel conceptualizations for how D/RS manifests in relationships. Our analysis indicated three defining features of D/RS: unwillingness , dishonesty , and norms . Additionally, our results provided insight into complicating contextual factors that further nuance D/RS: fear of repercussions , justification , values , networks , and isolation . This research offers insight into how support providers engage in D/RS, which could be an intermediate step between offering positive support and choosing to disengage as a support provider. Moreover, understanding how providers navigate challenges when communicating support is key as scholars strive to understand what creates satisfying supportive relationships.

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Executive Office of the President (US), University of Alabama (US), Colorado State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.