Inertial scaling of mud flows in centrifuge modelling: a modelling of model approach

Debris flows and rapid gravity-driven mass movements, including mud flows, pose major geotechnical hazards in natural and engineered settings. Physical modelling in geotechnical centrifuges offers a controlled framework for investigating these phenomena, provided that appropriate scaling laws are satisfied. This paper presents drum-centrifuge experiments on mud flows, focusing on the assessment of inertial scaling through the modelling of model approach. The theoretical framework is based on a reduced, depth-integrated form of the Navier–Stokes equations for shallow, non-turbulent, non-Newtonian flows. Velocity–displacement relationships obtained at different centrifugal acceleration levels are compared at prototype scale. The results identify a quasi-linear propagation regime associated with an inertial–gravitational balance, in which velocity–displacement trends become approximately linear and converge after prototype-scale normalisation. This convergence provides experimental support for inertial similitude within the identified regime. Outside this interval, deviations arise as temporal acceleration and dissipative mechanisms become more relevant. The findings emphasise that inertial scaling in centrifuge modelling is regime-specific. They also show that, although local kinematic quantities satisfy inertial scaling during propagation, global outcomes such as runout distance are affected by processes outside the similitude regime and should be interpreted with caution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1680/jphmg.26.00002
Primary Topic
Granular flow and fluidized beds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inertial scaling of mud flows in centrifuge modelling: a modelling of model approach

Marcelo Muta Hotta, L C V Lima
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics
Granular flow and fluidized beds
article

Inertial scaling of mud flows in centrifuge modelling: a modelling of model approach

Marcelo Muta Hotta, L C V Lima
article en

Abstract

Debris flows and rapid gravity-driven mass movements, including mud flows, pose major geotechnical hazards in natural and engineered settings. Physical modelling in geotechnical centrifuges offers a controlled framework for investigating these phenomena, provided that appropriate scaling laws are satisfied. This paper presents drum-centrifuge experiments on mud flows, focusing on the assessment of inertial scaling through the modelling of model approach. The theoretical framework is based on a reduced, depth-integrated form of the Navier–Stokes equations for shallow, non-turbulent, non-Newtonian flows. Velocity–displacement relationships obtained at different centrifugal acceleration levels are compared at prototype scale. The results identify a quasi-linear propagation regime associated with an inertial–gravitational balance, in which velocity–displacement trends become approximately linear and converge after prototype-scale normalisation. This convergence provides experimental support for inertial similitude within the identified regime. Outside this interval, deviations arise as temporal acceleration and dissipative mechanisms become more relevant. The findings emphasise that inertial scaling in centrifuge modelling is regime-specific. They also show that, although local kinematic quantities satisfy inertial scaling during propagation, global outcomes such as runout distance are affected by processes outside the similitude regime and should be interpreted with caution.

International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Granular flow and fluidized beds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.