Deep learning classification of significant prostate cancer on MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Deep learning (DL) image analysis of prostate MRI can be integrated into the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway to improve biopsy decision making, reduce radiologist interpretation time, and decrease inter-reader variability. In this paper, we systematically review the current literature on DL classification of clinically significant prostate cancer detected on magnetic resonance imaging and perform a meta-analysis of reported external validation performance metrics. A literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify studies describing end-to-end DL classification models that distinguish clinically significant prostate cancer (defined as Gleason Grade Group ≥ 2) on biparametric or multiparametric MRI. Information on the data sources used for model training and external validation, reference standards, imaging sequences, DL architectures, model inputs, the use of gradient-weighted class activation mapping (GRAD-CAM) or saliency maps, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was extracted. Out of 387 potentially relevant studies, 7 were included in the final meta-analysis. 6 studies were retrospective in design and performed external validation using data from different institutions. One study employed both retrospective and prospective designs, validating the model on the prospective dataset. The pooled patient-level AUC was 0.83 [0.80, 0.86]. While current performance is promising, future research should prioritize prospective clinical trials, standardize reporting measures, and include direct comparisons to experienced radiologists. To ensure the development of widely generalizable models, future studies should evaluate performance on shared, large, and diverse datasets, enabling meaningful cross-study comparisons.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Abdominal Radiology
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-026-05639-2
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep learning classification of significant prostate cancer on MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis

K Watts, Tim Duong, Devaraju Kanmaniraja, Christopher Chung et al.
Abdominal Radiology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Deep learning classification of significant prostate cancer on MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis

K Watts, Tim Duong, Devaraju Kanmaniraja, Christopher Chung, Yossef Rubinov, Wei Hou, Julia Michalak, Andrewe Baca
article en

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) image analysis of prostate MRI can be integrated into the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway to improve biopsy decision making, reduce radiologist interpretation time, and decrease inter-reader variability. In this paper, we systematically review the current literature on DL classification of clinically significant prostate cancer detected on magnetic resonance imaging and perform a meta-analysis of reported external validation performance metrics. A literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify studies describing end-to-end DL classification models that distinguish clinically significant prostate cancer (defined as Gleason Grade Group ≥ 2) on biparametric or multiparametric MRI. Information on the data sources used for model training and external validation, reference standards, imaging sequences, DL architectures, model inputs, the use of gradient-weighted class activation mapping (GRAD-CAM) or saliency maps, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was extracted. Out of 387 potentially relevant studies, 7 were included in the final meta-analysis. 6 studies were retrospective in design and performed external validation using data from different institutions. One study employed both retrospective and prospective designs, validating the model on the prospective dataset. The pooled patient-level AUC was 0.83 [0.80, 0.86]. While current performance is promising, future research should prioritize prospective clinical trials, standardize reporting measures, and include direct comparisons to experienced radiologists. To ensure the development of widely generalizable models, future studies should evaluate performance on shared, large, and diverse datasets, enabling meaningful cross-study comparisons.

Abdominal Radiology
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), The Bronx Defenders (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.