Joint LHCb–Belle II prospects to constrain new physics in $$B\rightarrow D^{(*)}\tau u $$

Abstract Semileptonic $$b\rightarrow c\tau \bar{\nu }_{\tau }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>b</mml:mi> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ν</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mover> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> decays are powerful probes of non-Standard-Model effects within an effective-field-theory (EFT) framework, but fully exploiting them in current and future data demands combinations that maximise sensitivity while controlling biases from Standard-Model-based modelling and from theory inputs that are shared, and therefore correlated, across analyses in different experiments. We present a first sensitivity study of a combined extraction of Wilson coefficients in $$\bar{B}\rightarrow D^{(*)}\tau \bar{\nu }_{\tau }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mover> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ν</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mover> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> decays using LHCb- and Belle II-like analysis configurations. Detector simulations for signal and backgrounds are typically generated under Standard Model assumptions; if non-SM contributions are present, this can bias the fitted Wilson coefficients. In addition, hadronic inputs such as form-factor parameters of signal and background components are common across analyses, requiring a consistent treatment of fully correlated effects in combinations. To avoid repeating large-scale detector simulation for each EFT hypothesis, we use event-by-event reweighting to map simulated samples to arbitrary combinations of Wilson coefficients. We then compare a simultaneous fit across multiple $$\bar{B}\rightarrow D^{(*)}\tau \bar{\nu }_{\tau }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mover> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ν</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mover> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> channels and datasets with a combination based on post-fit averages. Sharing Wilson coefficients and common form-factor parameters in the simultaneous fit reduces model-induced biases and improves sensitivity relative to independent fits, providing a robust and scalable strategy for precision EFT constraints in $$b\rightarrow c\tau \bar{\nu }_{\tau }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>b</mml:mi> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ν</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mover> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> transitions using forthcoming LHCb and Belle II datasets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Physical Journal C
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15908-5
Primary Topic
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Joint LHCb–Belle II prospects to constrain new physics in $$B\rightarrow D^{(*)}\tau u $$

B. Mitreska, A. Mathad, Lorenz Gärtner, I. Tsaklidis et al.
The European Physical Journal C
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
article

Joint LHCb–Belle II prospects to constrain new physics in $$B\rightarrow D^{(*)}\tau u $$

B. Mitreska, A. Mathad, Lorenz Gärtner, I. Tsaklidis, F. U. Bernlochner, J. Albrecht, M. T. Prim, T. Colombo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Semileptonic $$b\rightarrow c\tau \bar{\nu }_{\tau }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>b</mml:mi> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ν</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mover> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> decays are powerful probes of non-Standard-Model effects within an effective-field-theory (EFT) framework, but fully exploiting them in current and future data demands combinations that maximise sensitivity while controlling biases from Standard-Model-based modelling and from theory inputs that are shared, and therefore correlated, across analyses in different experiments. We present a first sensitivity study of a combined extraction of Wilson coefficients in $$\bar{B}\rightarrow D^{(*)}\tau \bar{\nu }_{\tau }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mover> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ν</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mover> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> decays using LHCb- and Belle II-like analysis configurations. Detector simulations for signal and backgrounds are typically generated under Standard Model assumptions; if non-SM contributions are present, this can bias the fitted Wilson coefficients. In addition, hadronic inputs such as form-factor parameters of signal and background components are common across analyses, requiring a consistent treatment of fully correlated effects in combinations. To avoid repeating large-scale detector simulation for each EFT hypothesis, we use event-by-event reweighting to map simulated samples to arbitrary combinations of Wilson coefficients. We then compare a simultaneous fit across multiple $$\bar{B}\rightarrow D^{(*)}\tau \bar{\nu }_{\tau }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mover> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ν</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mover> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> channels and datasets with a combination based on post-fit averages. Sharing Wilson coefficients and common form-factor parameters in the simultaneous fit reduces model-induced biases and improves sensitivity relative to independent fits, providing a robust and scalable strategy for precision EFT constraints in $$b\rightarrow c\tau \bar{\nu }_{\tau }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>b</mml:mi> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ν</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mover> <mml:mi>τ</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> transitions using forthcoming LHCb and Belle II datasets.

The European Physical Journal CVol. 86(6)
University of Bonn (DE), TU Dortmund University (DE), University of Manchester (GB), LMU Klinikum (DE), European Organization for Nuclear Research (CH), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.