Unraveling material characteristics of different pork belly cuts from raw to dish: a comparative study of texture and flavor

Pork belly is widely favored for its alternating fat-lean layers, yet the raw material characteristics of different cuts-upper (UPB), middle (MPB), lower (LPB), and second-knife meat (SKM)-remain unclear. This study selected twice-cooked pork belly (TPB) as the model dish to systematically compare the texture, collagen, microstructure, and flavor of four cuts from raw to cooked stages. Texture analysis showed that the skin layer was mainly related to collagen, while the fat layer was influenced not only by collagen content and composition but also by the extracellular matrix network, as revealed by Masson staining. Lean meat texture was primarily determined by its proportion, resulting in 57.55 ~ 124.45% higher chewiness in SKM. Flavor and precursor analysis revealed that UPB was characterized by higher proline and C20:4n6 and was associated with higher relative abundance of sweet/citrus aldehydes. MPB generated fatty aroma linked to C18:1n9c. LPB delivered complex meaty/roasted flavors from C18:1n9c, C18:2n6c, and Phe. SKM exhibited a flavor profile dominated by 2,3-butanedione due to its high branched-chain amino acid content. Furthermore, biplot analysis elucidated the relationships between raw material characteristics and final quality attributes, providing a theoretical basis for selecting the pork belly cuts in industrial production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Science of Food
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-026-00967-5
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unraveling material characteristics of different pork belly cuts from raw to dish: a comparative study of texture and flavor

Yu Zhang, Wu Xl, Kangting Sun, Hu W et al.
npj Science of Food
Meat and Animal Product Quality
article

Unraveling material characteristics of different pork belly cuts from raw to dish: a comparative study of texture and flavor

Yu Zhang, Wu Xl, Kangting Sun, Hu W, Hankun Zhu, Xin Feng, Liang Ma, Jinyong Wang, Mi Tang, Yong Yu
article en

Abstract

Pork belly is widely favored for its alternating fat-lean layers, yet the raw material characteristics of different cuts-upper (UPB), middle (MPB), lower (LPB), and second-knife meat (SKM)-remain unclear. This study selected twice-cooked pork belly (TPB) as the model dish to systematically compare the texture, collagen, microstructure, and flavor of four cuts from raw to cooked stages. Texture analysis showed that the skin layer was mainly related to collagen, while the fat layer was influenced not only by collagen content and composition but also by the extracellular matrix network, as revealed by Masson staining. Lean meat texture was primarily determined by its proportion, resulting in 57.55 ~ 124.45% higher chewiness in SKM. Flavor and precursor analysis revealed that UPB was characterized by higher proline and C20:4n6 and was associated with higher relative abundance of sweet/citrus aldehydes. MPB generated fatty aroma linked to C18:1n9c. LPB delivered complex meaty/roasted flavors from C18:1n9c, C18:2n6c, and Phe. SKM exhibited a flavor profile dominated by 2,3-butanedione due to its high branched-chain amino acid content. Furthermore, biplot analysis elucidated the relationships between raw material characteristics and final quality attributes, providing a theoretical basis for selecting the pork belly cuts in industrial production.

npj Science of Food
Southwest University (CN), Chongqing Metrology Quality Inspection and Research Institute (CN), Chongqing Academy of Animal Science (CN), Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Chongqing University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.