Comparison of Deep Learning, Machine Learning, and Statistical Models for Precipitation and Temperature Forecasting Performance: A Case Study of Hakkari Province

This study compares three forecasting approaches for monthly mean temperature and total precipitation over Hakkari, southeastern Turkey: LSTM (deep learning), Random Forest (machine learning), and Prophet (statistical). ERA5 reanalysis data spanning 1940–2025 served as input, and model performance was evaluated using five metrics (RMSE, MAE, R², NSE, and KGE).Analysis of the 85-year ERA5 record reveals statistically significant warming across all seasons (0.221°C/10 years, p < 0.001), with spring warming being the strongest (1.578°C/10 years, p < 0.001). Long-term precipitation change remains negligible (+0.60 mm/10 years). Because snow cover and evapotranspiration were not directly modeled, interpretations related to snow-rain phase shifts and drought risk are treated as physically plausible implications rather than direct empirical conclusions.Under the leakage-safe evaluation, Prophet produced the best temperature performance (RMSE = 1.51°C, MAE = 1.15°C, R2 = 0.976, NSE = 0.976, KGE = 0.952), followed by Random Forest (RMSE = 1.96°C, MAE = 1.59°C, R2 = 0.960, NSE = 0.960, KGE = 0.839) and LSTM (RMSE = 2.52°C, MAE = 2.08°C, R² = 0.933, NSE = 0.933, KGE = 0.791).Precipitation forecasting was consistently more demanding than temperature forecasting. Prophet achieved the best precipitation performance (RMSE = 50.15 mm, MAE = 33.88 mm, R² = 0.601, NSE = 0.601, KGE = 0.681), while Random Forest (RMSE = 52.26 mm, MAE = 35.56 mm, R² = 0.567, NSE = 0.567, KGE = 0.672) and LSTM (RMSE = 53.80 mm, MAE = 36.80 mm, R² = 0.542, NSE = 0.542, KGE = 0.680) showed similar limited skill. These findings suggest that strongly seasonal variables such as temperature remain tractable across modeling frameworks, whereas monthly precipitation exhibits only moderate predictability under leakage-safe conditions when same-month information is excluded and lagged predictors are used. Future studies may benefit from incorporating additional spatial predictors, snow-related variables, and hydrometeorological indicators, as well as testing hybrid deep learning and ensemble learning architectures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Firat University Journal of Experimental and Computational Engineering
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62520/fujece.1915506
Primary Topic
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Deep Learning, Machine Learning, and Statistical Models for Precipitation and Temperature Forecasting Performance: A Case Study of Hakkari Province

Ertuğrul Gül
Firat University Journal of Experimental and Computational Engineering
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
article

Comparison of Deep Learning, Machine Learning, and Statistical Models for Precipitation and Temperature Forecasting Performance: A Case Study of Hakkari Province

Ertuğrul Gül
article en

Abstract

This study compares three forecasting approaches for monthly mean temperature and total precipitation over Hakkari, southeastern Turkey: LSTM (deep learning), Random Forest (machine learning), and Prophet (statistical). ERA5 reanalysis data spanning 1940–2025 served as input, and model performance was evaluated using five metrics (RMSE, MAE, R², NSE, and KGE).Analysis of the 85-year ERA5 record reveals statistically significant warming across all seasons (0.221°C/10 years, p < 0.001), with spring warming being the strongest (1.578°C/10 years, p < 0.001). Long-term precipitation change remains negligible (+0.60 mm/10 years). Because snow cover and evapotranspiration were not directly modeled, interpretations related to snow-rain phase shifts and drought risk are treated as physically plausible implications rather than direct empirical conclusions.Under the leakage-safe evaluation, Prophet produced the best temperature performance (RMSE = 1.51°C, MAE = 1.15°C, R2 = 0.976, NSE = 0.976, KGE = 0.952), followed by Random Forest (RMSE = 1.96°C, MAE = 1.59°C, R2 = 0.960, NSE = 0.960, KGE = 0.839) and LSTM (RMSE = 2.52°C, MAE = 2.08°C, R² = 0.933, NSE = 0.933, KGE = 0.791).Precipitation forecasting was consistently more demanding than temperature forecasting. Prophet achieved the best precipitation performance (RMSE = 50.15 mm, MAE = 33.88 mm, R² = 0.601, NSE = 0.601, KGE = 0.681), while Random Forest (RMSE = 52.26 mm, MAE = 35.56 mm, R² = 0.567, NSE = 0.567, KGE = 0.672) and LSTM (RMSE = 53.80 mm, MAE = 36.80 mm, R² = 0.542, NSE = 0.542, KGE = 0.680) showed similar limited skill. These findings suggest that strongly seasonal variables such as temperature remain tractable across modeling frameworks, whereas monthly precipitation exhibits only moderate predictability under leakage-safe conditions when same-month information is excluded and lagged predictors are used. Future studies may benefit from incorporating additional spatial predictors, snow-related variables, and hydrometeorological indicators, as well as testing hybrid deep learning and ensemble learning architectures.

Firat University Journal of Experimental and Computational EngineeringVol. 5(2)
Hakkari University (TR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.