From degrees of embodiment to the quality of coupling: reorienting embodied pedagogy in physical education

A recurring strand of physical education (PE) scholarship presents PE as a distinctive or especially promising site of embodied learning. Yet although such claims are rarely advanced as an explicit doctrine, they become open to a scalar reading when they intersect with literatures that operationalise embodiment through gradable features such as bodily engagement, immersion, anthropomorphic cueing, and bodily awareness; on this reading, PE appears not merely embodied but more embodied than other subjects. Through a theory-led critical discourse reading of policy-facing, PE, and interdisciplinary embodiment texts, this article traces the interpretive slippage by which locally defined operational measures travel into curriculum discourse and make that reading plausible. Drawing on embodied cognitive science and Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology, it argues that embodiment is a structural condition of cognition, not a quantity unevenly distributed across subjects. On this basis, it rejects embodiment hierarchies, proposes cognitive parity, and reframes embodied pedagogy around the quality of body–environment–task coupling, developing five principles spanning perception, action, reflection, and the inclusive organisation of bodily difference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sport Education and Society
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2026.2694642
Primary Topic
Physical Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From degrees of embodiment to the quality of coupling: reorienting embodied pedagogy in physical education

Cong Liu, Xie Lei, Wang Chengqing, Gao Rong
Sport Education and Society
Physical Education and Pedagogy
article

From degrees of embodiment to the quality of coupling: reorienting embodied pedagogy in physical education

Cong Liu, Xie Lei, Wang Chengqing, Gao Rong
article en

Abstract

A recurring strand of physical education (PE) scholarship presents PE as a distinctive or especially promising site of embodied learning. Yet although such claims are rarely advanced as an explicit doctrine, they become open to a scalar reading when they intersect with literatures that operationalise embodiment through gradable features such as bodily engagement, immersion, anthropomorphic cueing, and bodily awareness; on this reading, PE appears not merely embodied but more embodied than other subjects. Through a theory-led critical discourse reading of policy-facing, PE, and interdisciplinary embodiment texts, this article traces the interpretive slippage by which locally defined operational measures travel into curriculum discourse and make that reading plausible. Drawing on embodied cognitive science and Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology, it argues that embodiment is a structural condition of cognition, not a quantity unevenly distributed across subjects. On this basis, it rejects embodiment hierarchies, proposes cognitive parity, and reframes embodied pedagogy around the quality of body–environment–task coupling, developing five principles spanning perception, action, reflection, and the inclusive organisation of bodily difference.

Sport Education and Society
Tajik State Pedagogical University (TJ), Liaocheng University (CN), Beijing Normal University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Physical Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.