Institutions for Autonomy: Facilitating Moral Selfhood by Design

ABSTRACT Modern institutions can be seen as ‘regimes of autonomy’, social contexts in which different criteria for autonomy are maintained. Some of these institutions provide individuals the opportunity to nurture their moral selfhood as they allow persons to learn the capacity for giving legitimate justifications for their decisions. Among these institutions are the court of law, the educational system, the public debate and the academic system. Contemporary technical and institutional developments, such as the implementation of digital systems and the privatisation of public services, challenge the capacity of institutions to nurture their moral selfhood. These developments introduce regimes of autonomy in which the autonomous self appears to often be understood as an empirical given, in the sense that there is no necessity to support decisions by giving reasons.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.70052
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutions for Autonomy: Facilitating Moral Selfhood by Design

Udo Pesch
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Institutions for Autonomy: Facilitating Moral Selfhood by Design

Udo Pesch
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Modern institutions can be seen as ‘regimes of autonomy’, social contexts in which different criteria for autonomy are maintained. Some of these institutions provide individuals the opportunity to nurture their moral selfhood as they allow persons to learn the capacity for giving legitimate justifications for their decisions. Among these institutions are the court of law, the educational system, the public debate and the academic system. Contemporary technical and institutional developments, such as the implementation of digital systems and the privatisation of public services, challenge the capacity of institutions to nurture their moral selfhood. These developments introduce regimes of autonomy in which the autonomous self appears to often be understood as an empirical given, in the sense that there is no necessity to support decisions by giving reasons.

Journal for the Theory of Social BehaviourVol. 56(3)
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.