Feasibility Study of Combined Systemic Therapy and Carbon‐Ion Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients

ABSTRACT Background Recent advances in systemic therapy, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have improved outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and enabled downstaging strategies that allow subsequent local treatments. Carbon‐ion radiotherapy (CIRT) can provide excellent tumor control with minimal impairment of liver function. However, the feasibility and safety of combining systemic therapy with CIRT have not been well evaluated. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 21 patients with HCC who received CIRT integrated with systemic therapy at a single institution. Systemic therapy consisted of TKIs or ICIs and was administered either before or after CIRT, reflecting real‐world clinical practice. The primary endpoint was feasibility and safety, assessed by the incidence of adverse events (AEs) graded by CTCAE v5.0 and changes in albumin–bilirubin (ALBI) and Child–Pugh scores. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and local control (LC). Results No grade ≥ 4 AEs were observed during peri‐radiotherapeutic integration of systemic therapy and CIRT. The most frequent AEs were grade 1 fatigue, radiation pneumonitis, and hepatobiliary disorders. Neither ALBI nor Child–Pugh scores showed clinically meaningful deterioration after CIRT, indicating preserved liver function. The 1‐year OS, PFS, and LC rates were 59.0%, 28.6%, and 70.6%, respectively. Despite large tumor burdens (median GTV 93.2 cm 3 ) and variable baseline liver function, treatment was generally well tolerated. Conclusions Integration of CIRT with systemic therapy was feasible and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile without worsening liver function. This multimodal approach may represent a treatment option for selected patients with HCC, particularly in downstaging or locally advanced settings. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Medicine
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.72068
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility Study of Combined Systemic Therapy and Carbon‐Ion Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients

Kei Shibuya, Kenichiro Araki, Ken Shirabe, Yuhei Miyasaka et al.
Cancer Medicine
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Feasibility Study of Combined Systemic Therapy and Carbon‐Ion Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients

Kei Shibuya, Kenichiro Araki, Ken Shirabe, Yuhei Miyasaka, Daijiro Kobayashi, Yuichi Yamazaki, Tatsuya Ohno
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Recent advances in systemic therapy, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have improved outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and enabled downstaging strategies that allow subsequent local treatments. Carbon‐ion radiotherapy (CIRT) can provide excellent tumor control with minimal impairment of liver function. However, the feasibility and safety of combining systemic therapy with CIRT have not been well evaluated. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 21 patients with HCC who received CIRT integrated with systemic therapy at a single institution. Systemic therapy consisted of TKIs or ICIs and was administered either before or after CIRT, reflecting real‐world clinical practice. The primary endpoint was feasibility and safety, assessed by the incidence of adverse events (AEs) graded by CTCAE v5.0 and changes in albumin–bilirubin (ALBI) and Child–Pugh scores. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and local control (LC). Results No grade ≥ 4 AEs were observed during peri‐radiotherapeutic integration of systemic therapy and CIRT. The most frequent AEs were grade 1 fatigue, radiation pneumonitis, and hepatobiliary disorders. Neither ALBI nor Child–Pugh scores showed clinically meaningful deterioration after CIRT, indicating preserved liver function. The 1‐year OS, PFS, and LC rates were 59.0%, 28.6%, and 70.6%, respectively. Despite large tumor burdens (median GTV 93.2 cm 3 ) and variable baseline liver function, treatment was generally well tolerated. Conclusions Integration of CIRT with systemic therapy was feasible and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile without worsening liver function. This multimodal approach may represent a treatment option for selected patients with HCC, particularly in downstaging or locally advanced settings. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Cancer MedicineVol. 15(7)
Gunma University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.