Getting SSPOT to run: Development of a novel direct observational tool for usage in clinical settings

INTRODUCTION: Limited literature exists describing the processes associated with developing and refining data collection tools. Thus, there is little opportunity to share lessons learned and strategies to overcome challenges. In this manuscript, we share our process of developing and iterative refining a data collection tool called SSPOT (Sociotechnical Systems Prospective Observational Tool) with the intended use of conducting observations in clinical settings. METHODS: Using SEIPS 2.0 as a guide, we developed and iteratively refined a digital tool (within REDCap) that facilitates capture of observational data in (near) real time across 4 phases: Prototype Development and Refinement, Nonclinical Pilot Testing, Clinical Pilot Testing, and Inter-Observer Consistency. RESULTS: The resultant tool supports manual documentation of observational data associated with activities, personnel, and tools/technologies. Development took 99 h, including 71 h of observation and 28 h of debriefing over 9 weeks, of which approximately 4 h of pilot testing were in a non-clinical setting. The coffee shop served as a successful alternative sociotechnical system for pilot testing. Once development was completed, the tool was used in an adult and a pediatric ED for three observational studies that cumulatively collected data for 399.08 h. DISCUSSION: By sharing the iterative development process, we aim to inform future de novo observational data collection tool development efforts. We recommend that research teams: 1) gather a team with multiple perspectives including human factors 2) plan and budget accordingly (including time) for data collection tool development and refinement, 3) consider leveraging creative and easily-accessible non-clinical settings for testing prior to piloting in the clinical setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Ergonomics
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2026.104844
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Getting SSPOT to run: Development of a novel direct observational tool for usage in clinical settings

Sarah Yale, Raji Venkitachalam, Elizabeth Lerner Papautsky, Matthew C. Scanlon et al.
Applied Ergonomics
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Getting SSPOT to run: Development of a novel direct observational tool for usage in clinical settings

Sarah Yale, Raji Venkitachalam, Elizabeth Lerner Papautsky, Matthew C. Scanlon, Nancy Jacobson, Ken Catchpole, Kimberlee Suenkens, Meagan M. Ladell, Mark Nimmer, Cara McCarthy
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Limited literature exists describing the processes associated with developing and refining data collection tools. Thus, there is little opportunity to share lessons learned and strategies to overcome challenges. In this manuscript, we share our process of developing and iterative refining a data collection tool called SSPOT (Sociotechnical Systems Prospective Observational Tool) with the intended use of conducting observations in clinical settings. METHODS: Using SEIPS 2.0 as a guide, we developed and iteratively refined a digital tool (within REDCap) that facilitates capture of observational data in (near) real time across 4 phases: Prototype Development and Refinement, Nonclinical Pilot Testing, Clinical Pilot Testing, and Inter-Observer Consistency. RESULTS: The resultant tool supports manual documentation of observational data associated with activities, personnel, and tools/technologies. Development took 99 h, including 71 h of observation and 28 h of debriefing over 9 weeks, of which approximately 4 h of pilot testing were in a non-clinical setting. The coffee shop served as a successful alternative sociotechnical system for pilot testing. Once development was completed, the tool was used in an adult and a pediatric ED for three observational studies that cumulatively collected data for 399.08 h. DISCUSSION: By sharing the iterative development process, we aim to inform future de novo observational data collection tool development efforts. We recommend that research teams: 1) gather a team with multiple perspectives including human factors 2) plan and budget accordingly (including time) for data collection tool development and refinement, 3) consider leveraging creative and easily-accessible non-clinical settings for testing prior to piloting in the clinical setting.

Applied ErgonomicsVol. 138
Medical University of South Carolina (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.