Early twice-daily toothbrushing and adolescent dental caries: a causal inference analysis using the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children

BACKGROUND: Dental caries is a highly prevalent chronic childhood condition, yet longitudinal evidence linking early oral hygiene behaviours to long-term outcomes remains limited. This study estimated whether twice-daily toothbrushing at age 2-3 years was associated with lower incident dental caries through adolescence, under a target trial emulation framework. METHODS: Data were from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC) B-cohort (N = 5,107). Children with caries at or before Wave 2 (age 2-3) were excluded, yielding an incident sample of 2,970. Associations were estimated using multivariable logistic regression, propensity score matching, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE), and g-computation. The outcome was carer-reported dental caries. Confounders were identified via directed acyclic graph (DAG) analysis. Effect modification by area-level socioeconomic position (SEP) was assessed through a pre-specified equity analysis. RESULTS: Among 2,941 children in the analytic sample, 1,559 (53.0%) developed carer-reported caries by age 14-15. Caries incidence was lower among children who brushed twice daily: 660 of 1,359 (48.6%) versus 899 of 1,582 (56.8%) in the less frequent group. The primary adjusted odds ratio (aOR) was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.63-0.85, p < 0.001). A dose-response gradient was observed (p-trend < 0.001). Effect estimates were similar across analytical approaches (OR range: 0.72-0.75). In non-disadvantaged areas, protective associations were observed (aOR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.54-0.79). In disadvantaged areas, the association was weaker and not statistically significant (aOR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.71-1.17; interaction p = 0.035). An exploratory falsification analysis using dental pain yielded a null result (aOR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.91-1.23, p = 0.47), but this outcome was interpreted cautiously because dental pain may lie downstream of caries. CONCLUSIONS: Twice-daily toothbrushing by age 2-3 years was associated with a lower risk of incident adolescent caries. Estimates from multiple causal inference approaches were consistent with an absolute risk reduction of approximately 8% points (NNT ≈ 13), under assumptions of no unmeasured confounding, adequate positivity, and correct model specification. Protective associations appeared concentrated in non-disadvantaged areas, suggesting that oral hygiene promotion should be combined with broader preventive strategies addressing structural determinants of oral health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08999-9
Primary Topic
Dental Health and Care Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early twice-daily toothbrushing and adolescent dental caries: a causal inference analysis using the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children

Yuehan Zhang, Nicole Stormon, Tehzeeb Zulfiqar, Alice Richardson et al.
BMC Oral Health
Dental Health and Care Utilization
article

Early twice-daily toothbrushing and adolescent dental caries: a causal inference analysis using the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children

Yuehan Zhang, Nicole Stormon, Tehzeeb Zulfiqar, Alice Richardson, Hesham M. Al-Sharani
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dental caries is a highly prevalent chronic childhood condition, yet longitudinal evidence linking early oral hygiene behaviours to long-term outcomes remains limited. This study estimated whether twice-daily toothbrushing at age 2-3 years was associated with lower incident dental caries through adolescence, under a target trial emulation framework. METHODS: Data were from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC) B-cohort (N = 5,107). Children with caries at or before Wave 2 (age 2-3) were excluded, yielding an incident sample of 2,970. Associations were estimated using multivariable logistic regression, propensity score matching, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE), and g-computation. The outcome was carer-reported dental caries. Confounders were identified via directed acyclic graph (DAG) analysis. Effect modification by area-level socioeconomic position (SEP) was assessed through a pre-specified equity analysis. RESULTS: Among 2,941 children in the analytic sample, 1,559 (53.0%) developed carer-reported caries by age 14-15. Caries incidence was lower among children who brushed twice daily: 660 of 1,359 (48.6%) versus 899 of 1,582 (56.8%) in the less frequent group. The primary adjusted odds ratio (aOR) was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.63-0.85, p < 0.001). A dose-response gradient was observed (p-trend < 0.001). Effect estimates were similar across analytical approaches (OR range: 0.72-0.75). In non-disadvantaged areas, protective associations were observed (aOR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.54-0.79). In disadvantaged areas, the association was weaker and not statistically significant (aOR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.71-1.17; interaction p = 0.035). An exploratory falsification analysis using dental pain yielded a null result (aOR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.91-1.23, p = 0.47), but this outcome was interpreted cautiously because dental pain may lie downstream of caries. CONCLUSIONS: Twice-daily toothbrushing by age 2-3 years was associated with a lower risk of incident adolescent caries. Estimates from multiple causal inference approaches were consistent with an absolute risk reduction of approximately 8% points (NNT ≈ 13), under assumptions of no unmeasured confounding, adequate positivity, and correct model specification. Protective associations appeared concentrated in non-disadvantaged areas, suggesting that oral hygiene promotion should be combined with broader preventive strategies addressing structural determinants of oral health.

BMC Oral Health
Australian National University (AU), The University of Queensland (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Dental Health and Care Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.