Experiences of Accessing Psychological Therapies for Self-Harm: A Qualitative Study of Stakeholders' Perspectives

Objectives Whilst rates of self-harm are rising in the UK people who self-harm can often struggle to access appropriate treatment. This study sought to explore adult stakeholders’ perspectives and experiences of the barriers to, and facilitators of, accessing support for self-harm and also how services could be better tailored to meet needs. Design A cross-sectional qualitative study. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted remotely with 19 participants in the UK, including 10 individuals with lived experience of self-harm and nine mental health professionals that worked with people who self-harm. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Results Both stakeholder groups felt that services did not offer appropriate support, there were system-level challenges and a sense of associated powerlessness. It was important to understand the person behind the behaviour, as a lack of understanding was reported to increase feelings of shame. Services that prioritise person-centred care, expert-by-experience involvement, and early intervention were valued. Professionals outlined the positives of brief interventions, whilst individuals who self-harm held concerns about whether briefer interventions addressed complex difficulties. Conclusions Findings highlight important organisational barriers and potential facilitators that individuals who self-harm may face when accessing psychological interventions. Results prompt to the need for inclusive and easily accessible services.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Published
2026-06-30
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiences of Accessing Psychological Therapies for Self-Harm: A Qualitative Study of Stakeholders' Perspectives

Isabel Adeyemi, Cameron Latham, Kamelia Harris, P Taylor et al.
Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Experiences of Accessing Psychological Therapies for Self-Harm: A Qualitative Study of Stakeholders' Perspectives

Isabel Adeyemi, Cameron Latham, Kamelia Harris, P Taylor, Stephen Kellett, Tara Chauhan, Catherine; id_orcid 0000-0001-7240-7107 Robinson
article en

Abstract

Objectives Whilst rates of self-harm are rising in the UK people who self-harm can often struggle to access appropriate treatment. This study sought to explore adult stakeholders’ perspectives and experiences of the barriers to, and facilitators of, accessing support for self-harm and also how services could be better tailored to meet needs. Design A cross-sectional qualitative study. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted remotely with 19 participants in the UK, including 10 individuals with lived experience of self-harm and nine mental health professionals that worked with people who self-harm. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Results Both stakeholder groups felt that services did not offer appropriate support, there were system-level challenges and a sense of associated powerlessness. It was important to understand the person behind the behaviour, as a lack of understanding was reported to increase feelings of shame. Services that prioritise person-centred care, expert-by-experience involvement, and early intervention were valued. Professionals outlined the positives of brief interventions, whilst individuals who self-harm held concerns about whether briefer interventions addressed complex difficulties. Conclusions Findings highlight important organisational barriers and potential facilitators that individuals who self-harm may face when accessing psychological interventions. Results prompt to the need for inclusive and easily accessible services.

Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.