Effects of orthokeratology on binocular vision and myopia control in adolescents

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of myopia control in adolescents wearing orthokeratology lenses (OKL) or single-vision spectacles (SVS). This prospective study included 30 myopic adolescents wearing orthokeratology lenses (OKL group) and 30 wearing SVS (SVS group). To prevent pseudo-replication arising from the strong correlation between fellow eyes, only right-eye data were analyzed, except for binocular tests requiring measurements from both eyes. All participants underwent assessments of visual acuity (VA), refraction, axial length (AL), and binocular visual function, including accommodative response, accommodative amplitude, distance and near heterophoria, gradient accommodative convergence/accommodation (AC/A) ratio, and horizontal fusional vergence. Binocular function was evaluated at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months, while VA, refraction, and AL were measured at baseline, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. At 12 months, AL progression was more severe in the SVS group than in the OKL group (P < .05). OKL improved uncorrected visual acuity to about -0.05 within 1 month and maintained stability, whereas SVS vision declined by 6 months. Best-corrected distance visual acuity improved markedly in the OKL group but only modestly in the SVS group. OKL rapidly corrected spherical equivalent refraction and reduced accommodative lag, with no group differences in accommodative amplitude. OKL effectively slowed axial elongation, improved VA, and reduced accommodative lag in myopic adolescents, demonstrating superior myopia-control efficacy compared with SVS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000049561
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of orthokeratology on binocular vision and myopia control in adolescents

Hui Xu, Chong Wang, Shuang Liang, Xishuo Tao
Medicine
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Effects of orthokeratology on binocular vision and myopia control in adolescents

Hui Xu, Chong Wang, Shuang Liang, Xishuo Tao
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of myopia control in adolescents wearing orthokeratology lenses (OKL) or single-vision spectacles (SVS). This prospective study included 30 myopic adolescents wearing orthokeratology lenses (OKL group) and 30 wearing SVS (SVS group). To prevent pseudo-replication arising from the strong correlation between fellow eyes, only right-eye data were analyzed, except for binocular tests requiring measurements from both eyes. All participants underwent assessments of visual acuity (VA), refraction, axial length (AL), and binocular visual function, including accommodative response, accommodative amplitude, distance and near heterophoria, gradient accommodative convergence/accommodation (AC/A) ratio, and horizontal fusional vergence. Binocular function was evaluated at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months, while VA, refraction, and AL were measured at baseline, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. At 12 months, AL progression was more severe in the SVS group than in the OKL group (P < .05). OKL improved uncorrected visual acuity to about -0.05 within 1 month and maintained stability, whereas SVS vision declined by 6 months. Best-corrected distance visual acuity improved markedly in the OKL group but only modestly in the SVS group. OKL rapidly corrected spherical equivalent refraction and reduced accommodative lag, with no group differences in accommodative amplitude. OKL effectively slowed axial elongation, improved VA, and reduced accommodative lag in myopic adolescents, demonstrating superior myopia-control efficacy compared with SVS.

MedicineVol. 105(26)
Weihai Municipal Hospital (CN), Central Hospital of Zibo (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.