Between Anticipation and Impact: Assessing Generative AI’s Influence on Journalistic Labor and Employment

This article explores the impact of generative artificial intelligence (genAI) on employment in journalism, drawing on 21 semi-structured expert interviews conducted in Flanders, Belgium. By examining how genAI technologies are strategically implemented, this research analyzes their consequent effects on labor dynamics and employment prospects within the profession. Contributing to the rapidly expanding scholarship on genAI and journalism, this article offers empirical insights into the evolving labor dynamics confronting media professionals. The findings reveal that genAI implementation mainly supports content distribution and routine tasks like transcribing and summarizing. Fully automated processes are implemented in news on sports and real estate transactions. These developments show that AI is currently not replacing news workers but is instead reconfiguring the profession by evolving the competencies and skillsets required of journalists. This happens through a combination of re-skilling, the upvaluing of new or existing skills (AI literacy, creative and digital storytelling, critical-analytical skills) and de-skilling, the devaluation of others (copy-editing, short news updates, traditional layouting). The article concludes by demonstrating how the narratives on labor and automation have barely changed over ten years despite significant technological advancements, and urges for more empirical research to prevent under- or overestimation of technology’s impact on journalism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism Practice
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2026.2692441
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between Anticipation and Impact: Assessing Generative AI’s Influence on Journalistic Labor and Employment

Sarah Van Leuven, Emma Verhoeven
Journalism Practice
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Between Anticipation and Impact: Assessing Generative AI’s Influence on Journalistic Labor and Employment

Sarah Van Leuven, Emma Verhoeven
article en

Abstract

This article explores the impact of generative artificial intelligence (genAI) on employment in journalism, drawing on 21 semi-structured expert interviews conducted in Flanders, Belgium. By examining how genAI technologies are strategically implemented, this research analyzes their consequent effects on labor dynamics and employment prospects within the profession. Contributing to the rapidly expanding scholarship on genAI and journalism, this article offers empirical insights into the evolving labor dynamics confronting media professionals. The findings reveal that genAI implementation mainly supports content distribution and routine tasks like transcribing and summarizing. Fully automated processes are implemented in news on sports and real estate transactions. These developments show that AI is currently not replacing news workers but is instead reconfiguring the profession by evolving the competencies and skillsets required of journalists. This happens through a combination of re-skilling, the upvaluing of new or existing skills (AI literacy, creative and digital storytelling, critical-analytical skills) and de-skilling, the devaluation of others (copy-editing, short news updates, traditional layouting). The article concludes by demonstrating how the narratives on labor and automation have barely changed over ten years despite significant technological advancements, and urges for more empirical research to prevent under- or overestimation of technology’s impact on journalism.

Journalism Practice
University of Antwerp (BE), Ghent University Hospital (BE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.