Variability in dairy farm greenhouse gas emissions: implications of gross and net GHG estimates for mitigation

Understanding variability in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions among dairy farms is essential for identifying effective mitigation strategies. This study quantified gross and net GHG emissions in 62 commercial dairy farms in Québec, including a subset of 42 farms for which soil and tree carbon stock changes were assessed. Mean gross GHG emissions were 1.05 ± 0.16 kg CO₂-eq/kg fat- and protein-corrected milk (FPCM), with moderate variability (CV = 14.6%; range: 0.59–1.42). Net GHG emissions, accounting for soil and tree carbon stock changes, averaged 1.06 ± 0.35 kg CO₂-eq/kg FPCM and showed greater variability (CV = 33%; range: 0.28–1.87). Enteric fermentation was the main emission source (48% of gross emissions), followed by manure management (18%), soil emissions (14%), and feed production (13%). Changes in soil and tree carbon stocks strongly influenced net emissions, with combined effects ranging from −0.66 to +0.52 kg CO₂-eq/kg FPCM. Cluster analyses revealed significant differences among farms for gross and net GHG emissions, showing that inclusion of carbon stock changes modified farm performance interpretation. Greater milk yield per cow, dietary starch content, and soil clay content were associated with lower emission intensity. Both emission sources and carbon sequestration contributed to farm-level variability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Animal Science
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2026-0019
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variability in dairy farm greenhouse gas emissions: implications of gross and net GHG estimates for mitigation

Édith Charbonneau, Alexis Ruíz-González, Sébastien Fournel, Sylvestre Delmotte et al.
Canadian Journal of Animal Science
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Variability in dairy farm greenhouse gas emissions: implications of gross and net GHG estimates for mitigation

Édith Charbonneau, Alexis Ruíz-González, Sébastien Fournel, Sylvestre Delmotte, Simon Binggeli, Frédérika Nadon
article en

Abstract

Understanding variability in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions among dairy farms is essential for identifying effective mitigation strategies. This study quantified gross and net GHG emissions in 62 commercial dairy farms in Québec, including a subset of 42 farms for which soil and tree carbon stock changes were assessed. Mean gross GHG emissions were 1.05 ± 0.16 kg CO₂-eq/kg fat- and protein-corrected milk (FPCM), with moderate variability (CV = 14.6%; range: 0.59–1.42). Net GHG emissions, accounting for soil and tree carbon stock changes, averaged 1.06 ± 0.35 kg CO₂-eq/kg FPCM and showed greater variability (CV = 33%; range: 0.28–1.87). Enteric fermentation was the main emission source (48% of gross emissions), followed by manure management (18%), soil emissions (14%), and feed production (13%). Changes in soil and tree carbon stocks strongly influenced net emissions, with combined effects ranging from −0.66 to +0.52 kg CO₂-eq/kg FPCM. Cluster analyses revealed significant differences among farms for gross and net GHG emissions, showing that inclusion of carbon stock changes modified farm performance interpretation. Greater milk yield per cow, dietary starch content, and soil clay content were associated with lower emission intensity. Both emission sources and carbon sequestration contributed to farm-level variability.

Canadian Journal of Animal Science
Ducks Unlimited Canada (CA), Université Laval (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.