Impact of RAS/RAF Mutations on Metastatic Treatment Response Following Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Stage IV Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND: The underlying biology and genetic status of rectal cancer can guide treatment options. However, there is limited understanding of the impact of underlying mutational status of RAS/RAF on TNT response in metastatic rectal cancer. This study aims to determine treatment response to TNT in patients harboring RAS/RAF mutations. METHODS: This prospective multicenter observational study identified patients diagnosed with synchronous metastatic rectal cancer suitable to receive personalized TNT (pTNT) treated with curative intent between 2019 and 2024. Metastatic treatment response to pTNT was compared between patient groups based on RAS/RAF mutational status. Three-year disease free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared. RESULTS: Seventy Stage IV rectal cancer patients were treated with curative intent and 49 had genetic testing available for inclusion. Among them, 27 (55.1%) patients had mutations (mRAS group) and 22 patients (44.9%) were wild-type (wtRAS group). mRAS patients were older than wtRAS patients (median 65.0 [60.0-71.0] vs. 55.5 years [39.0-69.25] respectively, p = 0.037). Synchronous metastases occurred more commonly in the liver than in the lungs (53.1% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.014). Complete metastatic tumor response to TNT was demonstrated in half as many mRAS as wtRAS patients (22.2% vs. 40.9%, p = 0.158) and disease progression was higher in patients harboring RAS mutations (37.0% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.280), but neither were significant. Differences in 3-year DFS and OS between the two groups did not reach significance. CONCLUSION: RAS/RAF mutations may negatively impact metastatic tumor response rates in curative Stage IV rectal cancer patients treated with pTNT. Larger scale studies are needed to verify these results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.70135
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of RAS/RAF Mutations on Metastatic Treatment Response Following Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Stage IV Rectal Cancer

Tracy Fitzsimmons, A. Badiei, E.L. Neo, M. Penniment et al.
Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Impact of RAS/RAF Mutations on Metastatic Treatment Response Following Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Stage IV Rectal Cancer

Tracy Fitzsimmons, A. Badiei, E.L. Neo, M. Penniment, T. Sammour, A. Ruszkiewicz, S. Selva‐Nayagam, Z. Bunjo, J. Wong
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The underlying biology and genetic status of rectal cancer can guide treatment options. However, there is limited understanding of the impact of underlying mutational status of RAS/RAF on TNT response in metastatic rectal cancer. This study aims to determine treatment response to TNT in patients harboring RAS/RAF mutations. METHODS: This prospective multicenter observational study identified patients diagnosed with synchronous metastatic rectal cancer suitable to receive personalized TNT (pTNT) treated with curative intent between 2019 and 2024. Metastatic treatment response to pTNT was compared between patient groups based on RAS/RAF mutational status. Three-year disease free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared. RESULTS: Seventy Stage IV rectal cancer patients were treated with curative intent and 49 had genetic testing available for inclusion. Among them, 27 (55.1%) patients had mutations (mRAS group) and 22 patients (44.9%) were wild-type (wtRAS group). mRAS patients were older than wtRAS patients (median 65.0 [60.0-71.0] vs. 55.5 years [39.0-69.25] respectively, p = 0.037). Synchronous metastases occurred more commonly in the liver than in the lungs (53.1% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.014). Complete metastatic tumor response to TNT was demonstrated in half as many mRAS as wtRAS patients (22.2% vs. 40.9%, p = 0.158) and disease progression was higher in patients harboring RAS mutations (37.0% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.280), but neither were significant. Differences in 3-year DFS and OS between the two groups did not reach significance. CONCLUSION: RAS/RAF mutations may negatively impact metastatic tumor response rates in curative Stage IV rectal cancer patients treated with pTNT. Larger scale studies are needed to verify these results.

Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
South Australia Pathology (AU), Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU), UCL Australia (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.