Anterior Versus Posterior Stabilization of Subaxial Cervical Spine Fracture-Dislocations, Dislocations and Subluxations: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Neurological and Radiological Outcomes

Background: Dislocations and fracture-dislocations of the lower cervical spine represent complex injuries with a high risk of neurological damage. Especially in the presence of a confirmed traumatic disc lesion, an anterior surgical approach is described as favoured in the literature. However, studies show that with sufficient reduction technique, even in the presence of a confirmed disc protrusion, posterior stabilization can be considered a safe therapeutic option. The aim of this study is to analyze anterior and posterior treatment of dislocations and fracture-dislocations of the subaxial cervical spine with regard to neurological and radiological outcomes. Methods: In our monocentric cohort study, we investigated the immediate postoperative radiological and neurological outcome depending on the chosen surgical approach and the presence of a disc protrusion. Patients treated at our centre between January 2005 and June 2025 were included. Patients with preoperative complete spinal cord injury were excluded. Neurological status was assessed using the ASIA score preoperatively at admission and postoperatively at discharge or prior to staged surgery. Results: A total of 92 patients were included in the study. Most patients showed an ASIA score C (33.7%). A total of 49 patients (53.3%) were operated anteriorly and 42 patients (45.6%) posteriorly. One patient was primarily stabilized bilaterally. Nine patients initially treated anteriorly had to be secondarily stabilized additionally from posterior. In both groups, neurological deterioration occurred in one case. All other patients remained stable on the ASIA score or improved by at least one point on the scale. Conclusions: The findings provide evidence in favour of a personalized, pathology-oriented approach to lower cervical spine fracture-dislocations rather than selecting the surgical approach based solely on the presence of traumatic disc protrusion. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these observations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm16070348
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anterior Versus Posterior Stabilization of Subaxial Cervical Spine Fracture-Dislocations, Dislocations and Subluxations: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Neurological and Radiological Outcomes

Martin Liebhauser, Ernst Müller, Haro Stettner, Martin Halbherr et al.
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

Anterior Versus Posterior Stabilization of Subaxial Cervical Spine Fracture-Dislocations, Dislocations and Subluxations: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Neurological and Radiological Outcomes

Martin Liebhauser, Ernst Müller, Haro Stettner, Martin Halbherr, Gorazd Kovac, Jochen Jung
article en

Abstract

Background: Dislocations and fracture-dislocations of the lower cervical spine represent complex injuries with a high risk of neurological damage. Especially in the presence of a confirmed traumatic disc lesion, an anterior surgical approach is described as favoured in the literature. However, studies show that with sufficient reduction technique, even in the presence of a confirmed disc protrusion, posterior stabilization can be considered a safe therapeutic option. The aim of this study is to analyze anterior and posterior treatment of dislocations and fracture-dislocations of the subaxial cervical spine with regard to neurological and radiological outcomes. Methods: In our monocentric cohort study, we investigated the immediate postoperative radiological and neurological outcome depending on the chosen surgical approach and the presence of a disc protrusion. Patients treated at our centre between January 2005 and June 2025 were included. Patients with preoperative complete spinal cord injury were excluded. Neurological status was assessed using the ASIA score preoperatively at admission and postoperatively at discharge or prior to staged surgery. Results: A total of 92 patients were included in the study. Most patients showed an ASIA score C (33.7%). A total of 49 patients (53.3%) were operated anteriorly and 42 patients (45.6%) posteriorly. One patient was primarily stabilized bilaterally. Nine patients initially treated anteriorly had to be secondarily stabilized additionally from posterior. In both groups, neurological deterioration occurred in one case. All other patients remained stable on the ASIA score or improved by at least one point on the scale. Conclusions: The findings provide evidence in favour of a personalized, pathology-oriented approach to lower cervical spine fracture-dislocations rather than selecting the surgical approach based solely on the presence of traumatic disc protrusion. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these observations.

Journal of Personalized MedicineVol. 16(7)
Klinikum Klagenfurt (AT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.