Colonization with extended-spectrum and AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and bacteremia risk in patients with acute leukemia who receive induction chemotherapy without fluoroquinolone prophylaxis

ABSTRACT Neutropenic patients colonized with extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) frequently develop ESBL-E bacteremia while receiving fluoroquinolone prophylaxis. However, the impact of colonization with ESBL-E and AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (AmpC-E) in neutropenic patients who do not receive fluoroquinolone prophylaxis is unclear. To investigate this, we conducted a prospective study of patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) receiving induction chemotherapy without antibacterial prophylaxis between November 2015 and January 2020. Stool or perianal swab specimens were collected from study participants within 5 days of initiating chemotherapy and underwent culture for ESBL-E and AmpC-E. Isolated organisms were identified and subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing and whole-genome sequencing. Bacteremia risk during neutropenia was compared between ESBL-E-colonized, AmpC-E-colonized, and non-colonized patients. We enrolled 159 patients, of whom 15 (9%) were colonized with ESBL-E and 17 (11%) with AmpC-E. Fourteen (93%) of 15 colonizing ESBL-E isolates were cefepime resistant, compared to 2 (12%) of 17 AmpC-E isolates. Three (20%) of 15 ESBL-E-colonized patients developed ESBL-E bacteremia (colonizing and bloodstream isolates were genetically identical for each patient), compared to 1 (1%) of 144 patients without ESBL-E colonization ( P = 0.001). ESBL-E-colonized patients were also more likely to develop bacteremia due to ceftriaxone-susceptible Enterobacterales than non-colonized patients. AmpC-E-colonized patients did not have an increased risk of gram-negative bacteremia. In patients with acute leukemia or MDS who receive induction chemotherapy without fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, ESBL-E colonization is associated with increased risk of gram-negative bacteremia due to ESBL-E and ceftriaxone-susceptible organisms. Screening for ESBL-E colonization in this population could optimize empirical antibacterial therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01738-25
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Colonization with extended-spectrum and AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and bacteremia risk in patients with acute leukemia who receive induction chemotherapy without fluoroquinolone prophylaxis

Michael J. Satlin, Gail J. Roboz, Lars F. Westblade, Kate Stoeckle et al.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
article

Colonization with extended-spectrum and AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and bacteremia risk in patients with acute leukemia who receive induction chemotherapy without fluoroquinolone prophylaxis

Michael J. Satlin, Gail J. Roboz, Lars F. Westblade, Kate Stoeckle, David Helfgott, Marisa La Spina, Barry N. Kreiswirth, Claire Douglass, Liang Chen, Michael Hovan, Emily Davidson, Sierra Derti, Justin Kaner, Ivo Sah Bandar
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Neutropenic patients colonized with extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) frequently develop ESBL-E bacteremia while receiving fluoroquinolone prophylaxis. However, the impact of colonization with ESBL-E and AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (AmpC-E) in neutropenic patients who do not receive fluoroquinolone prophylaxis is unclear. To investigate this, we conducted a prospective study of patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) receiving induction chemotherapy without antibacterial prophylaxis between November 2015 and January 2020. Stool or perianal swab specimens were collected from study participants within 5 days of initiating chemotherapy and underwent culture for ESBL-E and AmpC-E. Isolated organisms were identified and subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing and whole-genome sequencing. Bacteremia risk during neutropenia was compared between ESBL-E-colonized, AmpC-E-colonized, and non-colonized patients. We enrolled 159 patients, of whom 15 (9%) were colonized with ESBL-E and 17 (11%) with AmpC-E. Fourteen (93%) of 15 colonizing ESBL-E isolates were cefepime resistant, compared to 2 (12%) of 17 AmpC-E isolates. Three (20%) of 15 ESBL-E-colonized patients developed ESBL-E bacteremia (colonizing and bloodstream isolates were genetically identical for each patient), compared to 1 (1%) of 144 patients without ESBL-E colonization ( P = 0.001). ESBL-E-colonized patients were also more likely to develop bacteremia due to ceftriaxone-susceptible Enterobacterales than non-colonized patients. AmpC-E-colonized patients did not have an increased risk of gram-negative bacteremia. In patients with acute leukemia or MDS who receive induction chemotherapy without fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, ESBL-E colonization is associated with increased risk of gram-negative bacteremia due to ESBL-E and ceftriaxone-susceptible organisms. Screening for ESBL-E colonization in this population could optimize empirical antibacterial therapy.

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Allegheny Health Network (US), Cornell University (US), Presbyterian Hospital (US), Hackensack Meridian Health (US), Center for Discovery (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Melinta Therapeutics, Shionogi, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.