How Investment Companies With Purpose Bylaws Reframe Governance to Leverage Multiple Accountability Mechanisms for Systemic Impact

ABSTRACT Our research focuses on a French legal framework for corporate purpose that came into force with the 2019 Plan for Business Growth and Transformation law. The main differences with benefit corporations are that French law requires companies to be accountable by defining statutory environmental and social objectives, to take responsibility for achieving them through a mission committee, and to accept possible sanctions by an independent third‐party body. However, the operationality, implementation, and governance mechanisms surrounding corporate purpose remain puzzling. To resolve this issue, we collected data and conducted semi‐structured interviews with 20 investment companies. These companies play a central role in shaping corporate strategies through capital allocation and governance influence. Our findings enabled us to identify a governance model that aligns stakeholders around a purpose and leverages multiple accountability mechanisms for systemic impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regulation & Governance
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70182
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Investment Companies With Purpose Bylaws Reframe Governance to Leverage Multiple Accountability Mechanisms for Systemic Impact

Marie Baudoux, Carine Girard‐Guerraud, Xavier Hollandts
Regulation & Governance
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

How Investment Companies With Purpose Bylaws Reframe Governance to Leverage Multiple Accountability Mechanisms for Systemic Impact

Marie Baudoux, Carine Girard‐Guerraud, Xavier Hollandts
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Our research focuses on a French legal framework for corporate purpose that came into force with the 2019 Plan for Business Growth and Transformation law. The main differences with benefit corporations are that French law requires companies to be accountable by defining statutory environmental and social objectives, to take responsibility for achieving them through a mission committee, and to accept possible sanctions by an independent third‐party body. However, the operationality, implementation, and governance mechanisms surrounding corporate purpose remain puzzling. To resolve this issue, we collected data and conducted semi‐structured interviews with 20 investment companies. These companies play a central role in shaping corporate strategies through capital allocation and governance influence. Our findings enabled us to identify a governance model that aligns stakeholders around a purpose and leverages multiple accountability mechanisms for systemic impact.

Regulation & Governance
Audencia Business School (FR), Universidad del Desarrollo Empresarial y Pedagógico (MX), Kedge Business School (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.