Religion, Cognitive Trust, and Critical Thinking: A Thomistic Approach to the Cognitive Dimension of Religion

Contemporary debates in the cognitive science of religion often portray religiosity as cognitively weak, manipulable, and opposed to critical thinking. This article challenges such reductionist interpretations by proposing a Thomistic framework for understanding religion as a source of cognitive trust and epistemic resilience. Drawing on the epistemology of Thomas Aquinas, we argue that faith is a rational act of the intellect—not blind assent but thinking with assent. Using a qualitative, normative-analytical approach, we examine religion’s ambivalent role in contexts of misinformation, disinformation, and digital manipulation (e.g., deepfakes). While religious communities can be vulnerable to ideological distortion, the Thomistic account of intellectual and moral virtues offers conceptual tools for discernment. Faith, understood analogically and open to doubt, fosters epistemic humility and mental flexibility rather than dogmatic closure. We argue that authentic religious practice can enhance cognitive safety by integrating moral formation, communal verification of truth claims, and virtue-based discernment. In this perspective, religion does not undermine critical thinking but may strengthen resistance to epistemic pollution in the digital age, provided it remains rooted in intellectual virtue rather than ideological rigidity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pastoral Psychology
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-026-01347-2
Primary Topic
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Religion, Cognitive Trust, and Critical Thinking: A Thomistic Approach to the Cognitive Dimension of Religion

Piotr Roszak, Łukasz Skarżyński, Przemysław Witkowski
Pastoral Psychology
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
article

Religion, Cognitive Trust, and Critical Thinking: A Thomistic Approach to the Cognitive Dimension of Religion

Piotr Roszak, Łukasz Skarżyński, Przemysław Witkowski
article en

Abstract

Contemporary debates in the cognitive science of religion often portray religiosity as cognitively weak, manipulable, and opposed to critical thinking. This article challenges such reductionist interpretations by proposing a Thomistic framework for understanding religion as a source of cognitive trust and epistemic resilience. Drawing on the epistemology of Thomas Aquinas, we argue that faith is a rational act of the intellect—not blind assent but thinking with assent. Using a qualitative, normative-analytical approach, we examine religion’s ambivalent role in contexts of misinformation, disinformation, and digital manipulation (e.g., deepfakes). While religious communities can be vulnerable to ideological distortion, the Thomistic account of intellectual and moral virtues offers conceptual tools for discernment. Faith, understood analogically and open to doubt, fosters epistemic humility and mental flexibility rather than dogmatic closure. We argue that authentic religious practice can enhance cognitive safety by integrating moral formation, communal verification of truth claims, and virtue-based discernment. In this perspective, religion does not undermine critical thinking but may strengthen resistance to epistemic pollution in the digital age, provided it remains rooted in intellectual virtue rather than ideological rigidity.

Pastoral Psychology
Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL)
John Templeton Foundation
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.