Factors Associated with Omission of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Patients with Clinical Node-Positive Breast Cancer Who have Residual Nodal Disease on Pathology After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: For breast cancer patients with clinically node-positive (cN+) and residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains the standard of care, though alternative strategies may be selected by multidisciplinary teams in certain cases. This study evaluated factors associated with omission of ALND for cN+ patients who were pathologically node-positive after NAC (ypN+). METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, the National Cancer Database was queried for patients with clinical T1-T4, N1-N3 breast cancer from 2016 to 2021 who received NAC and were subsequently ypN+. Axillary procedures were categorized as sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone, SLNB followed by ALND (SLNB + ALND), or ALND alone. Logistic regression identified factors associated with omission of ALND after SLNB, adjusting for sociodemographic, geographic, and clinical variables. RESULTS: Among 38,559 patients, axillary interventions were SLNB alone (n = 7,131, 18.49%), SLNB+ALND (n = 14,247, 36.95%), and ALND alone (n = 17,179, 44.55%). Over the study period, SLNB alone and SLNB + ALND increased while ALND alone decreased. Compared with academic programs, patients treated at comprehensive community, integrated network, and community programs had greater odds of SLNB alone compared with SLNB+ALND (odds ratio [OR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-1.43; OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07-1.27; OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.33-1.78, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There has been de-escalation of ALND after initial SLNB for cN+ breast cancer patients found to be ypN+. This suggests that providers may be extrapolating evidence supporting SLNB alone to populations in which it has not yet been thoroughly studied or are omitting ALND in anticipation of ongoing clinical trial results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-026-19968-5
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Associated with Omission of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Patients with Clinical Node-Positive Breast Cancer Who have Residual Nodal Disease on Pathology After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Nicole Rademacher, K. Broman, Lily A. Gutnik
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Factors Associated with Omission of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Patients with Clinical Node-Positive Breast Cancer Who have Residual Nodal Disease on Pathology After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Nicole Rademacher, K. Broman, Lily A. Gutnik
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For breast cancer patients with clinically node-positive (cN+) and residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains the standard of care, though alternative strategies may be selected by multidisciplinary teams in certain cases. This study evaluated factors associated with omission of ALND for cN+ patients who were pathologically node-positive after NAC (ypN+). METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, the National Cancer Database was queried for patients with clinical T1-T4, N1-N3 breast cancer from 2016 to 2021 who received NAC and were subsequently ypN+. Axillary procedures were categorized as sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone, SLNB followed by ALND (SLNB + ALND), or ALND alone. Logistic regression identified factors associated with omission of ALND after SLNB, adjusting for sociodemographic, geographic, and clinical variables. RESULTS: Among 38,559 patients, axillary interventions were SLNB alone (n = 7,131, 18.49%), SLNB+ALND (n = 14,247, 36.95%), and ALND alone (n = 17,179, 44.55%). Over the study period, SLNB alone and SLNB + ALND increased while ALND alone decreased. Compared with academic programs, patients treated at comprehensive community, integrated network, and community programs had greater odds of SLNB alone compared with SLNB+ALND (odds ratio [OR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-1.43; OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07-1.27; OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.33-1.78, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There has been de-escalation of ALND after initial SLNB for cN+ breast cancer patients found to be ypN+. This suggests that providers may be extrapolating evidence supporting SLNB alone to populations in which it has not yet been thoroughly studied or are omitting ALND in anticipation of ongoing clinical trial results.

Annals of Surgical Oncology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
American College of Surgeons, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, National Cancer Institute, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.