Preferences and Heterogeneity of Urban Residents for River Cultural Ecosystem Services: A Comparative Study Between China and Russia Using a Choice Experiment

This study investigates how cultural and socio-psychological factors shape the valuation of cultural ecosystem services (CES) in urban river restoration, addressing the limited availability of cross-cultural empirical evidence. A discrete choice experiment was conducted with 222 urban residents in two culturally distinct cities: Nanyang, China (n = 120) and Rostov-on-Don, Russia (n = 102). Using a D-efficient design informed by pilot data, respondents evaluated tradeoffs among four CES attributes—walking trails, boating areas, cultural corridors, and wetland parks—along with an annual cost attribute. Mixed logit results indicate that while respondents in both cities exhibit positive willingness to pay for CES improvements, their preferences differ significantly: Nanyang residents prioritize recreational and aesthetic enhancements, whereas Rostov-on-Don residents place greater emphasis on cultural heritage. Interaction analyses further show that recreational habits, cultural identity, and environmental awareness significantly influence preference heterogeneity. These findings demonstrate that CES valuation is culturally embedded and provide an economic basis for designing context-specific and culturally responsive urban river restoration policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Society & Natural Resources
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2026.2693816
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preferences and Heterogeneity of Urban Residents for River Cultural Ecosystem Services: A Comparative Study Between China and Russia Using a Choice Experiment

Yinan Dong
Society & Natural Resources
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

Preferences and Heterogeneity of Urban Residents for River Cultural Ecosystem Services: A Comparative Study Between China and Russia Using a Choice Experiment

Yinan Dong
article en

Abstract

This study investigates how cultural and socio-psychological factors shape the valuation of cultural ecosystem services (CES) in urban river restoration, addressing the limited availability of cross-cultural empirical evidence. A discrete choice experiment was conducted with 222 urban residents in two culturally distinct cities: Nanyang, China (n = 120) and Rostov-on-Don, Russia (n = 102). Using a D-efficient design informed by pilot data, respondents evaluated tradeoffs among four CES attributes—walking trails, boating areas, cultural corridors, and wetland parks—along with an annual cost attribute. Mixed logit results indicate that while respondents in both cities exhibit positive willingness to pay for CES improvements, their preferences differ significantly: Nanyang residents prioritize recreational and aesthetic enhancements, whereas Rostov-on-Don residents place greater emphasis on cultural heritage. Interaction analyses further show that recreational habits, cultural identity, and environmental awareness significantly influence preference heterogeneity. These findings demonstrate that CES valuation is culturally embedded and provide an economic basis for designing context-specific and culturally responsive urban river restoration policies.

Society & Natural Resources
Henan University of Technology (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.