Nonverbal Auditory Communication for Human–Robot Interaction in Industry 5.0: A Scoping Review

In Industry 5.0 (I5.0), close-proximity human–robot collaboration demands communication beyond conventional alarms and speech. Nonverbal auditory communication offers a complementary modality, yet its role in I5.0 remains unmapped. This scoping review maps nonverbal auditory communication research in I5.0 Human–Robot Interaction (HRI) and compares it with general HRI literature to identify transfer potential and research gaps. Peer-reviewed English-language articles (2023–April 2026) addressing nonverbal sound in HRI contexts were included. Speech, emotion detection, haptic interfaces and non-HRI domains were excluded. A search with two syntaxes across Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, ACM and MDPI, supplemented by citation searching, targeted I5.0-specific (Syntax S1) and general HRI auditory literature (Syntax S2). This created two article record sets, n1 and n2. Articles were organized following Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and PRISMA-ScR into four inductively derived clusters: Sonification, Multimodal Feedback Systems, Safety and Frameworks and Concepts. From 782 initial records, 16 (n1) and 32 (n2) articles were included. In I5.0, multimodal feedback dominates: intentionally designed nonverbal sounds improve situational awareness, reduce cognitive workload and increase perceived safety. Compared to n2, which is shaped by social robotics and emotion-driven sound design, five gaps emerge in I5.0: absent emotion-related sound perception research, missing field studies, missing industry-specific sound design frameworks, underutilized sonification for spatial awareness and safety and no unimodal auditory studies under realistic industrial conditions. A dedicated sound design framework operationalizing I5.0 communicative requirements into designable sound parameters is needed, alongside empirical validation under realistic industrial noise conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Robotics
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics15070121
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonverbal Auditory Communication for Human–Robot Interaction in Industry 5.0: A Scoping Review

Alexander von Hoffmann, Manja Lohse, Sven Winkelmann, Tom Schmid
Robotics
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
article

Nonverbal Auditory Communication for Human–Robot Interaction in Industry 5.0: A Scoping Review

Alexander von Hoffmann, Manja Lohse, Sven Winkelmann, Tom Schmid
article en

Abstract

In Industry 5.0 (I5.0), close-proximity human–robot collaboration demands communication beyond conventional alarms and speech. Nonverbal auditory communication offers a complementary modality, yet its role in I5.0 remains unmapped. This scoping review maps nonverbal auditory communication research in I5.0 Human–Robot Interaction (HRI) and compares it with general HRI literature to identify transfer potential and research gaps. Peer-reviewed English-language articles (2023–April 2026) addressing nonverbal sound in HRI contexts were included. Speech, emotion detection, haptic interfaces and non-HRI domains were excluded. A search with two syntaxes across Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, ACM and MDPI, supplemented by citation searching, targeted I5.0-specific (Syntax S1) and general HRI auditory literature (Syntax S2). This created two article record sets, n1 and n2. Articles were organized following Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and PRISMA-ScR into four inductively derived clusters: Sonification, Multimodal Feedback Systems, Safety and Frameworks and Concepts. From 782 initial records, 16 (n1) and 32 (n2) articles were included. In I5.0, multimodal feedback dominates: intentionally designed nonverbal sounds improve situational awareness, reduce cognitive workload and increase perceived safety. Compared to n2, which is shaped by social robotics and emotion-driven sound design, five gaps emerge in I5.0: absent emotion-related sound perception research, missing field studies, missing industry-specific sound design frameworks, underutilized sonification for spatial awareness and safety and no unimodal auditory studies under realistic industrial conditions. A dedicated sound design framework operationalizing I5.0 communicative requirements into designable sound parameters is needed, alongside empirical validation under realistic industrial noise conditions.

RoboticsVol. 15(7)
Technologie- und Förderzentrum im Kompetenzzentrum für Nachwachsende Rohstoffe (DE), Georg Simon Ohm University of Applied Sciences Nuremberg (DE), User Interface Design (Germany) (DE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.