Beyond the Black Box: Human-AI Collaboration and Algorithmic Accountability in Arabic-Language Fact-Checking

This study examines how Artificial Intelligence (AI) is integrated into Arabic-language fact-checking ecosystems through semi-structured interviews with 12 practitioners and comparative case analysis of four organizations: Sanad, Fatabyyano, Sawab, and Misbar. Drawing on practitioner-reported routines and organizational practices, we analyze how AI supports verification under dialectal variation, geopolitical sensitivity, and uneven digital literacy. Results reveal a shift toward hybrid human-in-the-loop configurations in which AI assists triage and pattern detection while interpretive judgment and verification authority remain human-led. Organizations consistently prioritize procedural transparency, contextual accuracy, and institutional independence over speed and scale. These findings advance debates on algorithmic accountability and human oversight while contributing to scholarship on verification systems in the Global South. This study highlights the need for culturally aligned approaches to automated fact-checking in politically complex and multilingual information environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
Published
2026-06-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2026.2694044
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the Black Box: Human-AI Collaboration and Algorithmic Accountability in Arabic-Language Fact-Checking

Mohammed Ibahrine, Norita Ahmad
Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Beyond the Black Box: Human-AI Collaboration and Algorithmic Accountability in Arabic-Language Fact-Checking

Mohammed Ibahrine, Norita Ahmad
article en

Abstract

This study examines how Artificial Intelligence (AI) is integrated into Arabic-language fact-checking ecosystems through semi-structured interviews with 12 practitioners and comparative case analysis of four organizations: Sanad, Fatabyyano, Sawab, and Misbar. Drawing on practitioner-reported routines and organizational practices, we analyze how AI supports verification under dialectal variation, geopolitical sensitivity, and uneven digital literacy. Results reveal a shift toward hybrid human-in-the-loop configurations in which AI assists triage and pattern detection while interpretive judgment and verification authority remain human-led. Organizations consistently prioritize procedural transparency, contextual accuracy, and institutional independence over speed and scale. These findings advance debates on algorithmic accountability and human oversight while contributing to scholarship on verification systems in the Global South. This study highlights the need for culturally aligned approaches to automated fact-checking in politically complex and multilingual information environments.

Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
American University of Sharjah (AE), Northwestern University in Qatar (QA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.