Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the Executive Functioning Scale and the Daily Living Skills Scale in Children and Adolescents

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the psychometric properties of the Turkish versions of the Executive Functioning Scale (EFS) and the Daily Living Skills Scale (DLSS) in children and adolescents. METHODS: The sample included 197 participants (11-18 years), comprising 107 with neurodevelopmental disorders and 90 healthy controls. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and test-retest reliability was evaluated over 2 weeks in a subsample of 37 parents. Construct validity was examined with confirmatory factor analysis. Convergent validity of the EFS was assessed using correlations with the Teenage Executive Functioning Inventory (TEXI) and Trail Making Test (TMT); DLSS convergent validity was examined via correlations with the TEXI and EFS. Discriminant validity was determined by comparing clinical and control groups. RESULTS: The EFS showed high internal consistency (α = 0.969; subscales: 0.704-0.922) and strong test-retest reliability (r = 0.869). EFS total scores correlated strongly and negatively with TEXI (r = -0.78, p < 0.001), and TMT-B scores were significantly related to several EFS subscales. The DLSS had high internal consistency (α = 0.959) and good test-retest reliability (r = 0.823). DLSS total scores correlated negatively with TEXI (r = -0.495) and positively with EFS (r = 0.572). Both scales distinguished between clinical and control groups (p < 0.001). However, CFA findings indicated inadequate model fit for both scales (EFS: CFI = 0.636, RMSEA = 0.117; DLSS: CFI = 0.411, RMSEA = 0.191), suggesting that the original factor structures were not adequately replicated in the current sample. CONCLUSION: The Turkish versions of the EFS and DLSS demonstrated strong internal consistency, acceptable test-retest reliability and supportive evidence of convergent and known-groups validity. However, confirmatory factor analyses did not adequately support the original factor structures of either scale. Therefore, further studies are needed to clarify the structural validity and latent dimensional structure of these instruments in Turkish populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jdn.70152
Primary Topic
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the Executive Functioning Scale and the Daily Living Skills Scale in Children and Adolescents

Nagihan Cevher Binici, Şermin Yalın Sapmaz, Zeynep Ayaslan, Burcin Seyda Karaca et al.
International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
article

Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the Executive Functioning Scale and the Daily Living Skills Scale in Children and Adolescents

Nagihan Cevher Binici, Şermin Yalın Sapmaz, Zeynep Ayaslan, Burcin Seyda Karaca, Gonca Özyurt, Ömer Aydemir
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the psychometric properties of the Turkish versions of the Executive Functioning Scale (EFS) and the Daily Living Skills Scale (DLSS) in children and adolescents. METHODS: The sample included 197 participants (11-18 years), comprising 107 with neurodevelopmental disorders and 90 healthy controls. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and test-retest reliability was evaluated over 2 weeks in a subsample of 37 parents. Construct validity was examined with confirmatory factor analysis. Convergent validity of the EFS was assessed using correlations with the Teenage Executive Functioning Inventory (TEXI) and Trail Making Test (TMT); DLSS convergent validity was examined via correlations with the TEXI and EFS. Discriminant validity was determined by comparing clinical and control groups. RESULTS: The EFS showed high internal consistency (α = 0.969; subscales: 0.704-0.922) and strong test-retest reliability (r = 0.869). EFS total scores correlated strongly and negatively with TEXI (r = -0.78, p < 0.001), and TMT-B scores were significantly related to several EFS subscales. The DLSS had high internal consistency (α = 0.959) and good test-retest reliability (r = 0.823). DLSS total scores correlated negatively with TEXI (r = -0.495) and positively with EFS (r = 0.572). Both scales distinguished between clinical and control groups (p < 0.001). However, CFA findings indicated inadequate model fit for both scales (EFS: CFI = 0.636, RMSEA = 0.117; DLSS: CFI = 0.411, RMSEA = 0.191), suggesting that the original factor structures were not adequately replicated in the current sample. CONCLUSION: The Turkish versions of the EFS and DLSS demonstrated strong internal consistency, acceptable test-retest reliability and supportive evidence of convergent and known-groups validity. However, confirmatory factor analyses did not adequately support the original factor structures of either scale. Therefore, further studies are needed to clarify the structural validity and latent dimensional structure of these instruments in Turkish populations.

International Journal of Developmental NeuroscienceVol. 86(5)
Manisa Celal Bayar University (TR), Dokuz Eylül University (TR), Izmir Kâtip Çelebi University (TR), Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University (TR), Turku City Hospital (FI)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.